H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Sergiy Stakhovsky vs Robby Ginepri H2H: 0-1
Robby Ginepri holds a 1–0 lead over Sergiy Stakhovsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Robby Ginepri leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Robby Ginepri won the 2014 Atlanta third round 7-6(3) 3-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 43
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2014* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Robby Ginepri | 7-6(3) 3-6 6-0 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Robby Ginepri | #1,221 | #15 | 1,525 | 1,927 | 185 | 194 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | Robby Ginepri | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #175 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #32 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #63 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #15 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 |
| 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 |
| 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #134 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,814 | 0 | 2 |
| 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #100 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |
| 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #144 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 |
| 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #311 | 1,665 | 0 | 3 |
| 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #287 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 |
| 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 |
| 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #223 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |
| 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |