H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Sergiy Stakhovsky vs Sanam Singh
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Sergiy Stakhovsky vs Sanam Singh.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
IND
Age 38
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Sanam Singh | #1,698 | #266 | 185 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | Sanam Singh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |