H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Sergiy Stakhovsky vs Teymuraz Gabashvili H2H: 1-1

Sergiy Stakhovsky and Teymuraz Gabashvili are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sergiy Stakhovsky leads 1–0 on clay, while Teymuraz Gabashvili leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Teymuraz Gabashvili won the 2014 Australian Open first round 6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sergiy Stakhovsky
UKR Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Teymuraz Gabashvili
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Teymuraz Gabashvili #58 6-4 6-4 Sergiy Stakhovsky #93 Match data Apr 13, 2014 Q1 Q Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Teymuraz Gabashvili #79 6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 6-0 Sergiy Stakhovsky #82 Match data Jan 15, 2014* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Sergiy Stakhovsky #34 7-6(5) 6-3 Teymuraz Gabashvili #81 Match data May 18, 2011* R32 Nice ATP 250 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sergiy Stakhovsky #678 #31 1,263 1,838 145 196 42.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Teymuraz Gabashvili #1,373 #43 1,226 1,838 110 196 35.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sergiy Stakhovsky Teymuraz Gabashvili
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2004 0–1 0.0% #335 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 3–3 50.0% #184 1,527 0 0 2004 0–2 0.0% #258 1,482 0 0
20 2006 1–2 33.3% #195 1,525 0 0 2005 2–4 33.3% #132 1,460 0 0
21 2007 0–2 0.0% #199 1,509 0 0 2006 6–12 33.3% #112 1,518 0 0
22 2008 5–4 55.6% #92 1,615 0 1 2007 10–28 26.3% #125 1,600 0 0
23 2009 14–13 51.9% #60 1,751 0 2 2008 13–13 50.0% #65 1,663 0 0
24 2010 24–24 50.0% #46 1,743 0 4 2009 12–24 33.3% #106 1,558 0 0
25 2011 22–26 45.8% #62 1,707 0 4 2010 10–16 38.5% #80 1,689 0 0
26 2012 13–27 32.5% #103 1,737 0 4 2011 10–19 34.5% #138 1,658 0 0
27 2013 10–15 40.0% #98 1,678 0 4 2012 1–4 20.0% #182 1,581 0 0
28 2014 15–19 44.1% #58 1,685 0 4 2013 2–2 50.0% #76 1,626 0 0
29 2015 20–25 44.4% #62 1,715 0 4 2014 18–26 40.9% #67 1,737 0 0
30 2016 6–13 31.6% #109 1,693 0 4 2015 16–21 43.2% #50 1,775 0 0
31 2017 6–8 42.9% #122 1,728 0 4 2016 10–22 31.2% #138 1,628 0 0
32 2018 2–5 28.6% #134 1,650 0 4 2017 0–3 0.0% #237 1,535 0 0
33 2019 3–6 33.3% #150 1,576 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2020 0–1 0.0% #202 1,568 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2021 1–2 33.3% #220 1,530 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sergiy Stakhovsky Teymuraz Gabashvili
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2004 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2004 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2007 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 2 3 5 40.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
22 2008 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 9 17 26 34.6% 0 6 6 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2009 12 8 20 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2008 7 8 15 46.7% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — —
24 2010 16 16 32 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2009 5 12 17 29.4% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
25 2011 12 14 26 46.2% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2010 6 12 18 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2012 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2011 4 11 15 26.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2013 5 7 12 41.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2012 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2014 7 13 20 35.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2013 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2015 15 16 31 48.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2014 9 14 23 39.1% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2016 3 9 12 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2015 9 15 24 37.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2017 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2016 5 10 15 33.3% 4 9 13 30.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
32 2018 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2019 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 90 116 206 43.7% 27 48 75 36.0% 24 28 52 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% — 60 109 169 35.5% 41 63 104 39.4% 6 17 23 26.1% 3 7 10 30.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 340/341 of Sergiy Stakhovsky's and 301/306 of Teymuraz Gabashvili's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sergiy Stakhovsky Teymuraz Gabashvili
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2004 1/1 3.0 0.0 75.0% 52.8% 33.3% 37.5% 0.0% 47.9% 26.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 6/6 7.8 2.3 68.1% 69.1% 51.4% 59.4% 48.7% 62.5% 30.3% 2004 2/2 5.0 3.5 56.2% 66.0% 28.1% 48.4% 50.0% 49.4% 32.5%
20 2006 3/3 8.7 3.0 63.9% 69.3% 44.4% 60.4% 28.3% 60.4% 28.8% 2005 6/6 5.0 2.7 52.8% 70.5% 47.3% 34.2% 38.1% 59.4% 37.5%
21 2007 2/2 3.5 2.5 56.3% 61.7% 48.8% 50.0% 25.0% 56.7% 30.6% 2006 18/18 5.3 3.2 55.1% 72.1% 53.6% 52.0% 32.9% 63.4% 34.2%
22 2008 9/9 4.9 2.1 64.2% 72.7% 48.9% 67.9% 38.9% 64.6% 31.6% 2007 38/38 5.6 4.8 54.2% 72.1% 45.6% 56.5% 44.0% 60.0% 31.5%
23 2009 27/27 6.5 2.3 63.7% 71.9% 48.8% 60.8% 43.0% 63.6% 35.5% 2008 25/26 4.6 3.2 60.7% 70.7% 47.9% 63.6% 48.7% 62.0% 35.9%
24 2010 48/48 6.8 2.5 63.4% 71.3% 46.5% 57.4% 34.7% 62.4% 35.6% 2009 35/36 4.7 5.5 55.0% 67.4% 45.1% 57.1% 41.8% 57.5% 33.6%
25 2011 48/48 5.5 1.9 62.0% 70.0% 50.3% 53.4% 40.4% 62.5% 36.8% 2010 26/26 5.3 3.7 55.5% 73.9% 51.4% 58.3% 36.9% 63.7% 34.9%
26 2012 39/40 6.4 3.1 59.5% 71.4% 52.8% 63.8% 36.1% 63.8% 34.7% 2011 28/29 2.9 3.6 59.1% 64.8% 49.8% 45.4% 32.9% 58.5% 35.4%
27 2013 25/25 6.4 2.7 63.1% 70.1% 51.1% 55.3% 37.2% 62.9% 35.6% 2012 5/5 2.2 3.0 60.3% 66.8% 46.6% 53.5% 37.9% 60.2% 39.8%
28 2014 34/34 6.3 3.4 64.2% 72.9% 47.6% 62.6% 43.5% 63.8% 34.9% 2013 4/4 5.3 2.5 60.4% 64.5% 55.9% 66.9% 27.0% 61.0% 35.8%
29 2015 45/45 6.5 2.4 61.9% 71.3% 51.1% 61.8% 35.4% 63.6% 35.1% 2014 43/44 3.1 3.0 59.2% 67.2% 47.4% 55.2% 37.8% 58.9% 36.9%
30 2016 19/19 6.8 4.1 56.6% 71.9% 48.9% 53.3% 39.4% 62.1% 32.7% 2015 37/37 5.4 4.4 56.7% 72.4% 51.7% 65.8% 36.9% 63.4% 35.4%
31 2017 14/14 9.4 2.5 62.2% 75.4% 51.6% 57.0% 39.5% 66.3% 32.9% 2016 31/32 4.3 4.1 57.8% 71.0% 46.5% 56.8% 39.4% 60.7% 35.5%
32 2018 7/7 8.9 3.3 61.6% 69.4% 46.8% 52.2% 21.1% 60.6% 32.9% 2017 3/3 5.7 3.0 55.8% 73.1% 45.8% 43.5% 19.7% 60.8% 33.6%
33 2019 9/9 9.1 2.7 63.5% 71.2% 49.6% 65.1% 39.6% 63.1% 30.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1/1 4.0 3.0 67.1% 58.8% 48.0% 66.7% 100.0% 55.3% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 3/3 9.0 4.3 57.2% 76.8% 51.5% 65.6% 56.1% 66.0% 29.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 340/341 6.6 2.7 62.2% 71.3% 49.6% 59.0% 38.3% 63.1% 34.7% — 301/306 4.5 3.9 57.0% 69.9% 48.3% 56.5% 39.0% 60.5% 34.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sergiy Stakhovsky Teymuraz Gabashvili
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2004 1492 96.9 +1.37 -0.87 0.503 37.8% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1528 104.8 -1.62 -2.88 0.808 46.3% +15 — — 46.7% -0.53 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.25 2004 1483 99.7 -2.62 -3.21 0.643 42.2% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 0–1 — -0.04
20 2006 1525 115.1 +0.53 -0.16 0.727 45.0% -1 — — 37.5% -1.25 1–1 1–0 — -0.41 2005 1460 104.7 -1.72 +0.46 0.923 48.0% +39 — — 40.0% -0.73 1–2 (33%) — — -0.05
21 2007 1509 105.4 -2.12 -0.77 0.706 43.5% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.11 2006 1519 124.5 +0.17 -2.07 0.934 48.3% +30 -56 — 39.1% -0.56 4–5 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 104.6 +0.08
22 2008 1615 119.8 -0.38 -0.29 0.891 48.7% +20 — — 52.6% -0.16 3–0 (100%) 2–0 — -0.41 2007 1601 122.2 -2.72 -4.45 0.786 46.1% +27 -120 -80 32.2% -1.19 5–9 (36%) 6–7 (46%) 94.0 +0.15
23 2009 1751 134.9 -0.48 -0.33 0.976 50.0% +28 -170 -104 51.5% -0.01 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 105.1 +1.40 2008 1663 125.3 -1.37 -0.76 0.945 49.3% +18 -115 — 51.6% -0.16 3–5 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 102.1 -0.30
24 2010 1743 144.9 -0.90 -0.51 0.949 49.4% +38 -194 -15 52.2% -0.02 10–9 (53%) 14–7 (67%) 105.2 -0.67 2009 1558 127.3 -4.68 -2.56 0.791 46.0% 0 +87 -54 35.2% -1.04 6–6 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.6 -1.33
25 2011 1708 143.8 -0.30 -0.35 0.981 49.5% +47 -57 -27 45.3% -0.39 6–5 (55%) 12–8 (60%) 103.7 +0.79 2010 1690 131.4 +0.51 -0.82 0.960 49.6% -79 +40 — 45.1% -0.13 2–7 (22%) 4–9 (31%) 91.9 -0.07
26 2012 1737 144.8 +0.53 -1.27 0.957 49.3% +40 -119 -83 41.1% -0.43 3–9 (25%) 13–15 (46%) 95.4 -1.40 2011 1659 129.5 -3.46 -1.02 0.853 46.9% -19 -3 -119 37.5% -1.06 4–6 (40%) 9–5 (64%) 102.0 -1.17
27 2013 1678 130.6 -0.70 -1.39 0.958 49.3% +35 -75 +62 46.3% -0.34 1–7 (13%) 6–4 (60%) 95.4 -0.19 2012 1582 110.0 -1.43 -0.89 1.001 50.1% +36 — — 30.8% -0.69 0–1 1–1 — +0.59
28 2014 1686 132.7 -0.47 -0.60 0.964 49.2% -20 -108 +86 44.8% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 7–10 (41%) 102.0 -0.26 2013 1626 123.4 +0.15 -1.01 0.917 48.3% +2 — — 36.4% -0.27 2–0 0–2 — +0.01
29 2015 1716 153.5 -0.56 +0.26 0.966 49.5% +47 -150 -2 46.2% -0.07 8–7 (53%) 6–9 (40%) 102.1 -0.06 2014 1738 145.9 -3.57 +0.71 0.898 48.1% -11 -21 — 42.5% -0.47 6–4 (60%) 4–8 (33%) 100.8 -0.72
30 2016 1694 134.5 -0.30 -1.40 0.864 47.7% -19 — +108 37.2% -0.77 3–2 (60%) 4–5 (44%) 101.6 -0.26 2015 1776 146.4 -0.48 +0.12 0.968 49.3% -81 +102 — 45.7% -0.31 5–7 (42%) 8–4 (67%) 103.2 -1.36
31 2017 1728 130.1 +1.63 -2.29 0.977 50.1% -72 -66 — 47.2% -0.17 0–3 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 98.6 -0.83 2016 1628 128.0 -2.29 -1.28 0.903 48.3% -27 +144 -72 37.3% -0.49 3–7 (30%) 4–5 (44%) 95.2 +0.50
32 2018 1650 117.1 -1.87 -0.92 0.835 46.9% — — +170 36.4% -0.86 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.05 2017 1535 104.6 -1.16 -2.90 0.856 46.0% — — — 30.0% -1.50 0–2 1–1 — +0.47
33 2019 1577 114.4 -0.93 -3.10 0.837 47.7% +2 — +208 34.8% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 99.2 +0.66 2018 1511 99.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1569 108.7 -0.29 -0.75 0.732 45.5% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1531 99.7 -1.61 -0.72 0.856 48.7% +30 — — 40.0% -0.20 1–1 0–2 — +0.06 2020 1498 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 1516 98.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1474 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1839 138.5 -0.39 -0.77 0.940 49.1% +25 -108 +39 45.2% -0.32 54–56 (49%) 80–71 (53%) 105.1 -0.38 — 1839 133.8 -2.16 -1.30 0.885 47.9% -15 +19 -83 39.9% -0.64 41–62 (40%) 53–54 (50%) 97.0 -1.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.