H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Sergiy Stakhovsky vs Teymuraz Gabashvili H2H: 1-1
Sergiy Stakhovsky and Teymuraz Gabashvili are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sergiy Stakhovsky leads 1–0 on clay, while Teymuraz Gabashvili leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Teymuraz Gabashvili won the 2014 Australian Open first round 6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 41
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2014 | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Clay | Teymuraz Gabashvili | 6-4 6-4 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| Jan 15, 2014* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Teymuraz Gabashvili | 6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 6-0 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| May 18, 2011* | Nice | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Teymuraz Gabashvili | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Teymuraz Gabashvili | #1,373 | #43 | 1,226 | 1,836 | 109 | 194 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | Teymuraz Gabashvili | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 10–28 | 26.3% | #125 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #80 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #138 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #182 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #67 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #50 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #138 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |