H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Shahar Perkiss vs Bill Scanlon H2H: 1-1
Shahar Perkiss and Bill Scanlon are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Shahar Perkiss leads 1–0 on carpet, while Bill Scanlon leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Shahar Perkiss won the 1985 Memphis second round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 63
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 1985* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Shahar Perkiss | 6-3 6-1 | Bill Scanlon | Match data |
| Jun 29, 1984* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Bill Scanlon | 6-2 6-3 6-3 | Shahar Perkiss | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shahar Perkiss | #869 | #53 | 124 | 1,753 | 46 | 52 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bill Scanlon | #996 | #9 | 56 | 2,017 | 307 | 259 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shahar Perkiss | Bill Scanlon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #510 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #616 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #76 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1985 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #41 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1986 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #157 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #25 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1987 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #284 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1988 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #468 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #71 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,828 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #750 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #180 | 1,668 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,656 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #99 | 1,562 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,534 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #320 | 1,598 | 0 | 7 |