H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Shahar Perkiss vs Chip Hooper H2H: 1-2
Chip Hooper holds a 2–1 lead over Shahar Perkiss in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Chip Hooper leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Shahar Perkiss won the 1986 Tel Aviv third round 2-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 63
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 1986* | Tel Aviv | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Shahar Perkiss | 2-6 6-1 6-4 | Chip Hooper | Match data |
| Apr 4, 1986* | Cologne | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Chip Hooper | 6-4 1-6 6-4 | Shahar Perkiss | Match data |
| Mar 21, 1985* | Nancy | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Chip Hooper | 6-3 7-6 | Shahar Perkiss | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shahar Perkiss | #869 | #53 | 124 | 1,753 | 46 | 52 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Chip Hooper | #1,046 | #17 | 0 | 1,854 | 104 | 119 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shahar Perkiss | Chip Hooper | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #510 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1983 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #616 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1984 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #76 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #390 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #390 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #157 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #32 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1987 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #284 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1988 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #468 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #96 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #114 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #222 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #750 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #150 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #561 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |