H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Shlomo Glickstein vs Bruce Manson H2H: 0-1
Bruce Manson holds a 1–0 lead over Shlomo Glickstein in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bruce Manson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bruce Manson won the 1982 Columbus third round 3-6 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 68
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 70
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 1982* | Columbus | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Bruce Manson | 3-6 6-1 6-2 | Shlomo Glickstein | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shlomo Glickstein | #1,013 | #22 | 0 | 1,864 | 159 | 147 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Bruce Manson | #597 | #39 | 0 | 1,838 | 129 | 171 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shlomo Glickstein | Bruce Manson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #274 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #187 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #215 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1979 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #204 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #141 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1980 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #65 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #105 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1981 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #34 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #80 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1982 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #33 | 1,753 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #83 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1983 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #42 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #43 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1984 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #81 | 1,652 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1985 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #167 | 1,600 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #98 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1986 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #284 | 1,528 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #135 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #797 | 1,502 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |