H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Shuzo Matsuoka vs Andrea Gaudenzi H2H: 0-2
Andrea Gaudenzi holds a 2–0 lead over Shuzo Matsuoka in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrea Gaudenzi leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrea Gaudenzi won the 1996 US Open first round 7-6(4) 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 58
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 1996* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Andrea Gaudenzi | 7-6(4) 6-2 6-3 | Shuzo Matsuoka | Match data |
| May 24, 1996* | St. Poelten | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Andrea Gaudenzi | 6-0 6-1 | Shuzo Matsuoka | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuzo Matsuoka | #1,299 | #46 | 717 | 1,821 | 127 | 152 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Andrea Gaudenzi | #1,441 | #18 | 1,522 | 1,865 | 204 | 220 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shuzo Matsuoka | Andrea Gaudenzi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #861 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #691 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #632 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #370 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #260 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #60 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #82 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #24 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #181 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #144 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #57 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #64 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1993 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #84 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1994 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #124 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1995 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #63 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #54 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1996 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #148 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 11–26 | 29.7% | #120 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #534 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #293 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1324 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |