H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Shuzo Matsuoka vs Dan Goldie H2H: 1-1
Shuzo Matsuoka and Dan Goldie are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Shuzo Matsuoka won the 1991 Singapore fourth round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 58
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 1991* | Singapore | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Shuzo Matsuoka | 6-2 6-2 | Dan Goldie | Match data |
| Apr 21, 1990* | Seoul | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Dan Goldie | 7-5 6-2 | Shuzo Matsuoka | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuzo Matsuoka | #1,299 | #46 | 717 | 1,821 | 127 | 152 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Dan Goldie | #738 | #27 | 457 | 1,855 | 122 | 117 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shuzo Matsuoka | Dan Goldie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #691 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #370 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #260 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #82 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #101 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #181 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #265 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #144 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #113 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #50 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1992 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #64 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #29 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1993 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #67 | 1,735 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1994 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #124 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #96 | 1,657 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1995 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #63 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #181 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1996 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #148 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #534 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1324 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |