H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Shuzo Matsuoka vs Daniel Orsanic H2H: 1-0
Shuzo Matsuoka holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Orsanic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Shuzo Matsuoka leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Shuzo Matsuoka won the 1992 Roland Garros first round 6-1 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 58
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 58
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 1992* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Shuzo Matsuoka | 6-1 6-4 6-4 | Daniel Orsanic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuzo Matsuoka | #1,299 | #46 | 717 | 1,821 | 127 | 152 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Daniel Orsanic | #817 | #107 | 405 | 1,545 | 14 | 31 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shuzo Matsuoka | Daniel Orsanic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #691 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #370 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #260 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1988 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #82 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1989 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #181 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1990 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #144 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #184 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #64 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #128 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1994 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #124 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #224 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1995 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #63 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #377 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1996 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #148 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #228 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #534 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #695 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1324 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #826 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |