H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Shuzo Matsuoka vs David Rikl H2H: 1-1
Shuzo Matsuoka and David Rikl are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, David Rikl leads 1–0 on clay, while Shuzo Matsuoka leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Rikl won the 1996 Roland Garros first round 7-6(2) 7-5 6-7(4) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 58
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 55
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 1996* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | David Rikl | 7-6(2) 7-5 6-7(4) 6-1 | Shuzo Matsuoka | Match data |
| Mar 14, 1995* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Shuzo Matsuoka | 6-4 6-3 | David Rikl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuzo Matsuoka | #1,299 | #46 | 717 | 1,821 | 127 | 152 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| David Rikl | #852 | #41 | 809 | 1,685 | 53 | 92 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shuzo Matsuoka | David Rikl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #691 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #370 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #260 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #82 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #181 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #151 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #144 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #95 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #80 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #64 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #83 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #150 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1994 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #124 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #173 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1995 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #63 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1996 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #148 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #868 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #534 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1324 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |