H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Shuzo Matsuoka vs Horacio de la Pena H2H: 0-1
Horacio de la Pena holds a 1–0 lead over Shuzo Matsuoka in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Horacio de la Pena leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Horacio de la Pena won the 1988 Rye Brook third round 7-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 58
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 59
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 1988* | Rye Brook | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Horacio de la Pena | 7-6 7-6 | Shuzo Matsuoka | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuzo Matsuoka | #1,299 | #46 | 717 | 1,821 | 127 | 152 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Horacio de la Pena | #846 | #31 | 679 | 1,832 | 185 | 173 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shuzo Matsuoka | Horacio de la Pena | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #691 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #370 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #70 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #260 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #38 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1988 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #82 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #88 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1989 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #181 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1990 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #144 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #128 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1991 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #63 | 1,724 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1992 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #64 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #101 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1993 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #114 | 1,552 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1994 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #124 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #79 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1995 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #63 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #265 | 1,555 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1996 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #148 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #534 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1324 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |