H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Shuzo Matsuoka vs Jakob Hlasek H2H: 1-1
Shuzo Matsuoka and Jakob Hlasek are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Shuzo Matsuoka leads 1–0 on grass, while Jakob Hlasek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jakob Hlasek won the 1995 Los Angeles fourth round 6-3 4-6 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 58
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 1995* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jakob Hlasek | 6-3 4-6 7-6(5) | Shuzo Matsuoka | Match data |
| Jun 9, 1994* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Shuzo Matsuoka | 6-2 6-4 | Jakob Hlasek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuzo Matsuoka | #1,299 | #46 | 717 | 1,821 | 127 | 152 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jakob Hlasek | #583 | #7 | 1,308 | 2,062 | 389 | 300 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shuzo Matsuoka | Jakob Hlasek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #691 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #370 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #227 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #260 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #82 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #33 | 1,784 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #181 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #144 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #23 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 44–14 | 75.9% | #8 | 2,050 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1992 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #64 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1993 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1994 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #124 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,869 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1995 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #63 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #36 | 1,806 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1996 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #148 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,713 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #534 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1324 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,783 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #74 | 1,751 | 0 | 5 |