H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Shuzo Matsuoka vs Jim Courier H2H: 0-1

Jim Courier holds a 1–0 lead over Shuzo Matsuoka in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jim Courier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Courier won the 1993 Hong Kong Open round of 32 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shuzo Matsuoka
JPN Age 58 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Jim Courier
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jim Courier #2 6-3 6-2 Shuzo Matsuoka #77 Match data Apr 15, 1993* R32 Hong Kong Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Shuzo Matsuoka #1,299 #46 717 1,821 127 155 45.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Jim Courier #728 #1 3,973 2,216 489 223 68.7% 4 5 0 5 9 23

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shuzo Matsuoka Jim Courier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1987 0–2 0.0% #346 1,483 0 0
17 1985 0–1 0.0% #691 1,484 0 0 1988 21–15 58.3% #43 1,712 0 0
18 1986 1–3 25.0% #370 1,488 0 0 1989 30–18 62.5% #24 1,879 0 1
19 1987 1–3 25.0% #260 1,484 0 0 1990 39–21 65.0% #25 1,862 0 1
20 1988 12–15 44.4% #82 1,636 0 0 1991 57–17 77.0% #2 2,049 1 4
21 1989 8–11 42.1% #181 1,572 0 0 1992 68–16 81.0% #1 2,074 3 9
22 1990 9–13 40.9% #144 1,582 0 0 1993 58–17 77.3% #3 1,959 4 14
23 1991 23–19 54.8% #69 1,629 0 0 1994 43–19 69.4% #13 1,890 4 14
24 1992 20–16 55.6% #64 1,724 0 1 1995 59–20 74.7% #8 1,989 4 18
25 1993 15–15 50.0% #127 1,674 0 1 1996 28–17 62.2% #26 1,852 4 19
26 1994 8–14 36.4% #124 1,627 0 1 1997 34–19 64.2% #21 1,827 4 22
27 1995 16–17 48.5% #63 1,706 0 1 1998 19–17 52.8% #77 1,737 4 23
28 1996 12–24 33.3% #148 1,576 0 1 1999 29–20 59.2% #32 1,795 4 23
29 1997 2–3 40.0% #534 1,580 0 1 2000 4–5 44.4% #290 1,737 4 23
30 1998 0–1 0.0% #1324 1,561 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Shuzo Matsuoka Jim Courier
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 12 10 22 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7%
18 1986 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 19 10 29 65.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
19 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 16 8 24 66.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5%
20 1988 9 10 19 47.4% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1991 37 8 45 82.2% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
21 1989 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1992 36 6 42 85.7% 15 2 17 88.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 15 7 22 68.2%
22 1990 8 11 19 42.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 39 9 48 81.3% 12 1 13 92.3% 6 1 7 85.7% 1 6 7 14.3%
23 1991 19 14 33 57.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 17 8 25 68.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7%
24 1992 11 10 21 52.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1995 49 12 61 80.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0%
25 1993 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1996 10 7 17 58.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7%
26 1994 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1997 26 10 36 72.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 1995 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 1998 6 8 14 42.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 1996 8 14 22 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1999 14 12 26 53.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4%
29 1997 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 84 98 182 46.2% 7 17 24 29.2% 23 18 41 56.1% 13 22 35 37.1% — 285 114 399 71.4% 108 45 153 70.6% 26 17 43 60.5% 70 47 117 59.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 175/205 of Shuzo Matsuoka's and 473/566 of Jim Courier's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Shuzo Matsuoka Jim Courier
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 60/74 5.4 2.2 63.3% 73.8% 56.0% 62.7% 44.2% 67.4% 41.3%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 69/84 5.3 2.4 60.8% 77.6% 55.0% 64.3% 45.3% 68.7% 41.7%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 61/75 4.9 2.7 60.8% 75.1% 56.5% 67.7% 45.3% 67.9% 41.7%
23 1991 36/42 6.0 2.6 60.1% 72.1% 51.0% 65.1% 46.0% 63.8% 37.3% 1994 54/62 4.1 2.5 61.6% 75.3% 53.5% 59.7% 45.0% 66.8% 40.8%
24 1992 32/36 7.0 2.7 60.2% 74.9% 54.2% 59.1% 46.2% 66.7% 35.9% 1995 66/79 5.4 2.9 62.0% 75.7% 54.4% 67.1% 47.4% 67.5% 40.1%
25 1993 24/30 7.7 2.9 62.1% 74.2% 49.0% 67.1% 40.4% 65.0% 33.8% 1996 40/45 5.9 3.2 60.1% 74.7% 53.8% 57.4% 43.4% 66.6% 39.6%
26 1994 21/22 8.9 2.7 58.3% 74.9% 53.8% 57.6% 44.3% 66.2% 34.8% 1997 43/53 4.8 3.0 59.8% 73.7% 52.8% 54.7% 45.2% 65.1% 38.2%
27 1995 29/33 9.7 3.4 63.2% 76.2% 48.2% 62.9% 38.1% 66.1% 34.8% 1998 31/36 4.9 2.2 64.3% 71.9% 52.8% 60.1% 36.6% 64.9% 36.9%
28 1996 29/36 7.4 3.3 61.4% 71.3% 46.0% 53.1% 46.7% 61.5% 34.5% 1999 41/49 6.0 2.5 66.0% 75.0% 55.7% 62.7% 39.4% 68.4% 36.5%
29 1997 3/5 10.3 1.7 59.3% 74.7% 57.9% 66.7% 6.7% 67.6% 31.0% 2000 8/9 6.3 2.8 59.3% 72.8% 52.6% 60.6% 42.6% 64.7% 34.7%
30 1998 1/1 8.0 0.0 53.2% 69.7% 41.4% 50.0% 0.0% 56.5% 30.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 175/282 7.7 2.9 60.8% 73.8% 50.4% 61.0% 43.0% 64.8% 35.2% — 473/712 5.2 2.6 61.9% 75.0% 54.6% 62.5% 44.1% 67.2% 39.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Shuzo Matsuoka Jim Courier
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1484 102.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.12
17 1985 1484 97.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.17 1988 1712 137.8 — — — — +4 -126 — 58.0% +0.40 5–6 (45%) 9–2 (82%) 104.7 -0.43
18 1986 1488 115.9 — — — — +38 — — 25.0% -3.00 — — — -0.18 1989 1879 152.8 — — — — -3 -151 — 59.7% +0.64 7–10 (41%) 12–7 (63%) 102.2 -3.51
19 1987 1485 110.8 — — — — +50 — — 30.0% -0.40 1–1 0–1 — -0.11 1990 1863 156.8 — — — — +8 -32 -251 63.3% +1.10 8–8 (50%) 9–9 (50%) 97.9 -0.68
20 1988 1637 136.4 — — — — +14 -128 — 47.1% -0.24 2–6 (25%) 6–9 (40%) 95.2 -1.46 1991 2049 168.0 +6.14 +3.91 1.266 54.2% +16 -86 -347 71.0% +1.28 14–5 (74%) 12–9 (57%) 106.5 -2.20
21 1989 1573 109.4 — — — — +34 — — 42.0% -0.98 2–3 (40%) 7–4 (64%) 101.0 +1.13 1992 2075 169.6 +6.83 +4.55 1.332 54.9% +18 +15 -351 74.4% +1.70 12–5 (71%) 24–11 (69%) 105.2 -1.89
22 1990 1583 124.6 — — — — +10 — — 47.4% -0.35 3–5 (38%) 3–2 (60%) 98.5 +0.54 1993 1959 164.0 +6.33 +3.71 1.299 54.3% -24 +192 -55 73.5% +1.61 9–7 (56%) 15–12 (56%) 95.7 -1.11
23 1991 1629 133.0 +1.75 -1.11 1.030 50.8% +20 -126 -64 53.4% +0.34 8–7 (53%) 8–8 (50%) 100.8 +1.52 1994 1890 155.5 +5.14 +2.68 1.228 53.4% +9 +222 -1 66.7% +1.16 7–7 (50%) 10–13 (43%) 90.0 +0.52
24 1992 1725 139.5 +4.24 -0.99 1.078 51.7% -24 -226 -44 53.2% +0.21 7–7 (50%) 7–6 (54%) 106.4 -1.88 1995 1990 160.9 +5.29 +3.10 1.233 53.6% +22 +69 -186 71.5% +1.26 10–8 (56%) 26–14 (65%) 102.8 -0.63
25 1993 1674 124.0 +1.90 -2.99 0.965 49.7% +4 -120 -22 50.0% -0.04 5–4 (56%) 11–4 (73%) 106.5 +0.77 1996 1852 152.7 +4.18 +1.56 1.183 52.8% +59 +140 -53 60.7% +0.83 4–7 (36%) 12–11 (52%) 93.2 -0.33
26 1994 1627 134.9 +2.64 -1.49 1.029 50.3% -9 — +33 44.6% -0.13 1–8 (11%) 5–8 (38%) 91.0 -1.46 1997 1828 150.6 +2.66 +1.74 1.095 51.4% +66 +101 -50 62.0% +0.60 8–11 (42%) 12–10 (55%) 92.2 -1.90
27 1995 1706 136.1 +2.95 -1.36 1.027 50.5% -63 — +51 53.4% +0.03 5–9 (36%) 13–8 (62%) 103.3 -1.75 1998 1737 137.2 +2.52 -1.01 1.053 50.7% +53 +134 — 51.1% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 97.8 +0.91
28 1996 1576 127.9 -0.31 -1.95 0.894 48.5% +20 -69 +174 40.7% -0.40 4–8 (33%) 7–14 (33%) 92.8 -0.24 1999 1795 135.6 +4.87 -0.80 1.155 52.2% -5 +9 -45 56.8% +0.45 12–5 (71%) 20–11 (65%) 110.4 +0.59
29 1997 1581 109.2 +0.61 -1.20 0.956 47.8% +16 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 1–1 — +0.07 2000 1737 117.5 +0.53 -1.12 0.982 49.4% -2 — — 48.0% -0.44 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 98.0 +0.33
30 1998 1561 97.2 -1.03 -3.75 0.701 43.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1822 137.1 +2.15 -1.59 1.001 50.2% +2 -126 +27 47.7% -0.17 39–58 (40%) 68–65 (51%) 99.6 -0.97 — 2217 162.1 +5.11 +2.51 1.217 53.3% +16 +52 -127 65.7% +1.03 104–89 (54%) 174–120 (59%) 100.1 -1.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.