H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Shuzo Matsuoka vs Nicklas Kulti H2H: 1-0
Shuzo Matsuoka holds a 1–0 lead over Nicklas Kulti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Shuzo Matsuoka leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Shuzo Matsuoka won the 1994 Kuala Lumpur fourth round 7-6(8) 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 58
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 1994* | Kuala Lumpur | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Shuzo Matsuoka | 7-6(8) 7-6(4) | Nicklas Kulti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuzo Matsuoka | #1,299 | #46 | 717 | 1,821 | 127 | 152 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Nicklas Kulti | #977 | #32 | 826 | 1,819 | 150 | 179 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shuzo Matsuoka | Nicklas Kulti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #691 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #176 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #370 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #118 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #260 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #82 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1989 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #181 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #79 | 1,611 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1990 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #144 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #46 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1991 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #99 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1992 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #64 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,638 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1993 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,636 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1994 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #124 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #154 | 1,578 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1995 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #63 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #290 | 1,602 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1996 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #148 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #118 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #534 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,558 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1324 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |