H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Shuzo Matsuoka vs Yevgeny Kafelnikov H2H: 0-1
Yevgeny Kafelnikov holds a 1–0 lead over Shuzo Matsuoka in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yevgeny Kafelnikov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yevgeny Kafelnikov won the 1995 Long Island quarterfinal 5-7 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 58
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 52
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 1995* | Long Island | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | 5-7 6-2 6-2 | Shuzo Matsuoka | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuzo Matsuoka | #1,299 | #46 | 717 | 1,821 | 127 | 152 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Yevgeny Kafelnikov | #636 | #1 | 3,917 | 2,071 | 568 | 281 | 66.9% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 25 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shuzo Matsuoka | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #691 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #370 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #275 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #260 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #102 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #82 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 60–27 | 69.0% | #11 | 1,888 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1989 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #181 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 69–27 | 71.9% | #6 | 1,875 | 0 | 7 |
| 22 | 1990 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #144 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 73–25 | 74.5% | #3 | 1,972 | 1 | 11 |
| 23 | 1991 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #5 | 1,955 | 1 | 14 |
| 24 | 1992 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #64 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #11 | 1,950 | 1 | 17 |
| 25 | 1993 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 59–29 | 67.0% | #2 | 1,922 | 2 | 20 |
| 26 | 1994 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #124 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 58–31 | 65.2% | #5 | 1,859 | 2 | 21 |
| 27 | 1995 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #63 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 64–26 | 71.1% | #4 | 1,979 | 2 | 23 |
| 28 | 1996 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #148 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #27 | 1,809 | 2 | 25 |
| 29 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #534 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #41 | 1,708 | 2 | 25 |
| 30 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1324 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |