H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Simon Youl vs Broderick Dyke H2H: 1-0
Simon Youl holds a 1–0 lead over Broderick Dyke in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Simon Youl leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Simon Youl won the 1989 Queen's Club second round 7-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 61
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 65
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 1989* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Simon Youl | 7-6 7-5 | Broderick Dyke | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simon Youl | #1,263 | #80 | 474 | 1,704 | 91 | 140 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Broderick Dyke | #819 | #35 | 221 | 1,715 | 78 | 121 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Simon Youl | Broderick Dyke | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1982 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #450 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #201 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1985 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #90 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1986 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #258 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1987 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #121 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #109 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #179 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #156 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #295 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #154 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #116 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #140 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #66 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #94 | 1,559 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #120 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #200 | 1,444 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #113 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #151 | 1,443 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #170 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #171 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #752 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #545 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #696 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |