H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Simon Youl vs Eric Jelen H2H: 2-2
Simon Youl and Eric Jelen are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Eric Jelen leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Simon Youl leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Eric Jelen won the 1990 Hong Kong third round 1-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 61
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
GER
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 1990* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Eric Jelen | 1-0 (ret.) | Simon Youl | Match data |
| Oct 6, 1989* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Eric Jelen | 7-6 7-5 | Simon Youl | Match data |
| Aug 25, 1988* | Rye Brook | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Simon Youl | 6-2 4-6 6-0 | Eric Jelen | Match data |
| Jun 11, 1986* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Simon Youl | 6-2 6-3 | Eric Jelen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simon Youl | #1,263 | #80 | 474 | 1,704 | 91 | 140 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Eric Jelen | #1,153 | #23 | 575 | 1,805 | 124 | 127 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Simon Youl | Eric Jelen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1982 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #450 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #201 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #450 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #90 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #168 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #258 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #172 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #121 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #31 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #109 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #40 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #156 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #76 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #154 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #47 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1991 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #140 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1992 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #94 | 1,559 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #118 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1993 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #200 | 1,444 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1994 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #151 | 1,443 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |