H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Simon Youl vs Mark Kratzmann H2H: 2-2
Simon Youl and Mark Kratzmann are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Simon Youl won the 1992 Tokyo Outdoor second round 6-1 3-6 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 61
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 60
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 1992* | Tokyo Outdoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Simon Youl | 6-1 3-6 7-6(2) | Mark Kratzmann | Match data |
| Oct 4, 1990* | Sydney Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Mark Kratzmann | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Simon Youl | Match data |
| Jul 25, 1990* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Mark Kratzmann | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | Simon Youl | Match data |
| Jul 18, 1990* | Washington | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Simon Youl | 6-3 6-4 | Mark Kratzmann | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simon Youl | #1,263 | #80 | 474 | 1,704 | 91 | 140 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mark Kratzmann | #1,147 | #50 | 557 | 1,750 | 60 | 96 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Simon Youl | Mark Kratzmann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1982 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #450 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #616 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1984 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #201 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #246 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #90 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #209 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #258 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #121 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #182 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #109 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #156 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #122 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #154 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #75 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #140 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #208 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #94 | 1,559 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #572 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #200 | 1,444 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1994 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #151 | 1,443 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |