H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 07:16 UTC
Simone Bolelli vs Bjorn Phau H2H: 0-1
Bjorn Phau holds a 1–0 lead over Simone Bolelli in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bjorn Phau leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bjorn Phau won the 2011 Chennai third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 46
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2011* | Chennai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Bjorn Phau | 6-2 6-2 | Simone Bolelli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simone Bolelli | #1,391 | #36 | 1,686 | 1,920 | 114 | 156 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bjorn Phau | #1,098 | #59 | 1,038 | 1,733 | 80 | 138 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Simone Bolelli | Bjorn Phau | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #323 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #127 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #67 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #183 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #41 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #148 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #93 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #158 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #107 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #136 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #87 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #84 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #77 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #245 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #183 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #55 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2015 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,865 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #111 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2016 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #464 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #102 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #156 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #141 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #75 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #334 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #316 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #371 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 39 | 2025 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |