H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Simone Bolelli vs Daniel Koellerer H2H: 1-0
Simone Bolelli holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Koellerer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Simone Bolelli leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Simone Bolelli won the 2009 Wimbledon first round 6-7(3) 2-6 7-5 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2009* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Simone Bolelli | 6-7(3) 2-6 7-5 6-4 6-4 | Daniel Koellerer | Match data |
| Jan 16, 2007* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Q2 | Hard | Daniel Koellerer | 6-4 6-2 | Simone Bolelli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simone Bolelli | #1,391 | #36 | 1,686 | 1,920 | 114 | 156 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Daniel Koellerer | #385 | #55 | 904 | 1,653 | 19 | 34 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Simone Bolelli | Daniel Koellerer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #127 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #67 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #205 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #41 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #93 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #107 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #71 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #84 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #272 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #245 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #55 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,865 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #464 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #141 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #334 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |