H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Simone Bolelli vs Go Soeda H2H: 1-0
Simone Bolelli holds a 1–0 lead over Go Soeda in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Simone Bolelli leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Simone Bolelli won the 2015 Nottingham second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 41
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2019 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q3 | Clay | Simone Bolelli | 6-1 7-6(5) | Go Soeda | Match data |
| Jun 23, 2015* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Simone Bolelli | 6-3 6-2 | Go Soeda | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simone Bolelli | #1,391 | #36 | 1,686 | 1,920 | 114 | 156 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Go Soeda | #683 | #47 | 888 | 1,722 | 29 | 76 | 27.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Simone Bolelli | Go Soeda | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #127 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #67 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #41 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #93 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #114 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #107 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #238 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #120 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #84 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #245 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #60 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #55 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #103 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2015 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,865 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #99 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2016 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #464 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #126 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #141 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #334 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #133 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 39 | 2025 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |