H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Simone Bolelli vs Lukas Rosol H2H: 2-0
Simone Bolelli holds a 2–0 lead over Lukas Rosol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Simone Bolelli leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Simone Bolelli won the 2015 Hamburg third round 7-6(3) 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2015* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Simone Bolelli | 7-6(3) 7-6(6) | Lukas Rosol | Match data |
| Feb 12, 2015* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Simone Bolelli | 6-3 6-1 | Lukas Rosol | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simone Bolelli | #1,391 | #36 | 1,686 | 1,920 | 114 | 156 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lukas Rosol | #1,777 | #26 | 1,290 | 1,921 | 110 | 148 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Simone Bolelli | Lukas Rosol | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #127 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2007 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #67 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #41 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #93 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #107 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #70 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #84 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #73 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #245 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #47 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2014 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #55 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #31 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2015 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,865 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #55 | 1,846 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2016 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #464 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #203 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #141 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #142 | 1,703 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #334 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #180 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 39 | 2025 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |