H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Simone Bolelli vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 1-0
Simone Bolelli holds a 1–0 lead over Lukasz Kubot in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Simone Bolelli leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Simone Bolelli won the 2013 Doha fourth round 2-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2013* | Doha | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Simone Bolelli | 2-6 6-4 6-4 | Lukasz Kubot | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simone Bolelli | #1,391 | #36 | 1,686 | 1,920 | 114 | 156 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lukasz Kubot | #1,054 | #41 | 977 | 1,870 | 82 | 118 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Simone Bolelli | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #127 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #67 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #41 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #125 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #93 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #107 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #84 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #245 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #74 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #55 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #72 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,865 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #170 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #464 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #471 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #141 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #334 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |