H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Simone Bolelli vs Nicolas Mahut H2H: 1-0

Simone Bolelli holds a 1–0 lead over Nicolas Mahut in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Simone Bolelli leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Simone Bolelli won the 2017 Roland Garros first round 6-4 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Simone Bolelli
ITA Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Nicolas Mahut
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Simone Bolelli #470 6-4 6-2 6-2 Nicolas Mahut #48 Match data May 30, 2017* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Nicolas Mahut #103 6-7(9) 6-4 7-5 Simone Bolelli #126 Match data Oct 31, 2011 Q2 Q Valencia ATP 500 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Simone Bolelli #1,391 #36 1,686 1,931 113 157 41.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nicolas Mahut #1,433 #37 1,122 1,930 179 224 44.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Simone Bolelli Nicolas Mahut
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2000 0–2 0.0% #388 1,517 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2001 1–4 20.0% #216 1,500 0 0
20 2006 0–4 0.0% #127 1,465 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #269 1,446 0 0
21 2007 8–14 36.4% #67 1,601 0 0 2003 3–6 33.3% #94 1,539 0 0
22 2008 26–28 48.1% #41 1,775 0 0 2004 3–10 23.1% #131 1,545 0 0
23 2009 14–22 38.9% #93 1,698 0 0 2005 1–5 16.7% #134 1,467 0 0
24 2010 5–11 31.2% #107 1,672 0 0 2006 11–19 36.7% #66 1,581 0 0
25 2011 4–8 33.3% #134 1,679 0 0 2007 22–20 52.4% #45 1,732 0 0
26 2012 6–10 37.5% #84 1,713 0 0 2008 16–26 38.1% #94 1,645 0 0
27 2013 6–8 42.9% #245 1,693 0 0 2009 4–4 50.0% #214 1,634 0 0
28 2014 6–8 42.9% #55 1,744 0 0 2010 3–7 30.0% #132 1,663 0 0
29 2015 28–25 52.8% #58 1,874 0 0 2011 11–12 47.8% #80 1,776 0 0
30 2016 2–8 20.0% #464 1,791 0 0 2012 16–18 47.1% #108 1,757 0 0
31 2017 2–4 33.3% #171 1,801 0 0 2013 17–7 70.8% #50 1,852 0 2
32 2018 5–4 55.6% #141 1,788 0 0 2014 14–23 37.8% #117 1,664 0 2
33 2019 1–3 25.0% #334 1,736 0 0 2015 11–10 52.4% #71 1,767 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2016 23–20 53.5% #39 1,871 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2017 14–19 42.4% #103 1,754 0 4
36 — — — — — — — 2018 5–8 38.5% #190 1,708 0 4
37 — — — — — — — 2019 4–3 57.1% #194 1,707 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Simone Bolelli Nicolas Mahut
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 3 6 9 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2008 12 18 30 40.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2004 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 2009 6 13 19 31.6% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2005 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2010 0 5 5 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — 2006 4 9 13 30.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2007 11 13 24 45.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 3 13 76.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2012 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2008 13 16 29 44.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2013 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
28 2014 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2010 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
29 2015 16 15 31 51.6% 9 7 16 56.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2011 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
30 2016 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2012 10 14 24 41.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
31 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2013 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 2 14 85.7% — — — —
32 2018 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2014 7 13 20 35.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — —
33 2019 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 3 8 11 27.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 13 14 27 48.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 12 11 23 52.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
Career — 46 80 126 36.5% 50 59 109 45.9% 16 16 32 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — 92 133 225 40.9% 17 39 56 30.4% 67 41 108 62.0% 3 11 14 21.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 266/270 of Simone Bolelli's and 401/403 of Nicolas Mahut's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Simone Bolelli Nicolas Mahut
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 2/2 2.5 3.5 54.1% 65.6% 50.0% 54.2% 34.3% 58.4% 30.7%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 5/5 9.0 4.0 63.3% 71.4% 45.1% 59.0% 24.9% 61.6% 31.0%
20 2006 4/4 4.0 0.8 61.9% 62.3% 51.2% 60.8% 21.9% 58.5% 33.3% 2002 1/1 10.0 0.0 59.2% 69.0% 60.0% 0.0% 0.0% 65.3% 32.4%
21 2007 22/22 4.5 1.1 65.5% 68.7% 52.3% 48.4% 46.5% 63.0% 29.8% 2003 9/9 9.4 5.2 58.3% 71.9% 49.0% 55.7% 32.7% 62.4% 33.9%
22 2008 53/54 5.0 1.4 66.9% 70.0% 54.6% 67.0% 39.3% 64.9% 33.3% 2004 12/13 7.8 5.1 58.7% 68.5% 42.4% 46.6% 44.2% 57.7% 34.2%
23 2009 35/36 4.7 1.4 62.8% 69.0% 52.1% 63.8% 34.1% 62.8% 33.4% 2005 6/6 7.7 3.3 60.0% 77.5% 44.7% 36.9% 32.6% 64.2% 26.7%
24 2010 16/16 3.4 1.5 67.1% 66.4% 44.3% 48.6% 45.6% 59.2% 34.1% 2006 30/30 7.9 3.4 62.2% 70.5% 48.4% 56.4% 45.6% 62.2% 31.6%
25 2011 12/12 3.1 0.4 69.6% 62.8% 52.8% 55.1% 51.6% 59.7% 32.4% 2007 42/42 7.8 4.9 57.0% 75.5% 52.0% 61.9% 42.1% 65.2% 33.9%
26 2012 16/16 2.9 2.0 64.9% 69.4% 46.3% 52.2% 50.5% 61.5% 33.7% 2008 42/42 9.0 4.2 61.9% 72.6% 49.2% 63.1% 38.8% 63.7% 31.5%
27 2013 14/14 3.6 1.7 63.1% 66.1% 51.9% 38.0% 43.4% 61.0% 33.4% 2009 8/8 9.0 2.6 62.3% 80.1% 50.1% 63.2% 40.7% 68.9% 35.2%
28 2014 14/14 5.7 2.6 64.7% 70.3% 59.7% 44.0% 31.9% 66.1% 33.2% 2010 10/10 17.8 5.1 64.7% 76.0% 49.3% 66.9% 52.9% 66.5% 29.4%
29 2015 52/53 4.2 1.6 66.7% 72.3% 56.2% 63.8% 47.2% 66.8% 35.1% 2011 22/23 7.3 3.7 59.9% 74.6% 52.0% 61.9% 35.6% 65.3% 37.6%
30 2016 9/10 5.9 1.7 65.1% 66.8% 49.0% 60.6% 44.0% 60.3% 28.9% 2012 34/34 8.0 2.7 60.4% 72.3% 50.5% 64.5% 39.6% 63.8% 32.9%
31 2017 6/6 2.5 1.0 73.1% 61.7% 58.7% 62.5% 45.4% 60.9% 33.2% 2013 24/24 8.5 3.3 59.3% 79.5% 54.2% 71.3% 42.4% 69.1% 39.1%
32 2018 9/9 2.0 1.1 76.5% 65.6% 52.5% 65.5% 35.4% 62.1% 37.9% 2014 37/37 7.7 3.4 60.8% 72.2% 49.9% 55.5% 38.3% 63.6% 33.2%
33 2019 4/4 1.8 1.0 68.3% 62.6% 53.1% 50.6% 66.7% 59.4% 28.4% 2015 21/21 7.4 2.9 62.7% 72.3% 46.6% 58.6% 40.6% 63.0% 36.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 43/43 5.3 2.6 60.7% 74.0% 50.5% 58.7% 53.5% 64.9% 35.4%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 33/33 6.5 2.8 61.3% 70.8% 52.4% 60.0% 33.8% 63.7% 33.7%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 13/13 4.3 3.4 61.0% 72.2% 48.5% 54.4% 39.0% 62.9% 34.0%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 7/7 7.1 2.7 59.4% 72.5% 55.1% 71.2% 36.9% 65.8% 34.2%
Career — 266/270 4.2 1.5 66.3% 68.8% 53.1% 58.4% 42.5% 63.4% 33.3% — 401/403 7.7 3.5 60.6% 73.3% 50.1% 60.0% 41.0% 64.2% 33.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Simone Bolelli Nicolas Mahut
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1518 106.3 -0.24 -1.50 0.740 45.8% — — — 16.7% -1.50 0–1 — — +0.11
19 2005 1496 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1500 110.5 -0.73 -2.42 0.806 46.0% +14 — — 31.3% -1.25 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.14
20 2006 1465 108.7 -0.66 -0.84 0.803 46.1% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–2 1–3 (25%) — -0.29 2002 1447 95.7 -1.89 -0.35 0.934 45.8% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.22
21 2007 1602 127.2 +0.03 -4.56 0.806 47.1% -42 -20 — 34.6% -0.88 1–1 4–6 (40%) — -1.31 2003 1540 115.6 +0.41 -1.30 0.903 48.1% +28 — — 23.8% -1.38 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.20
22 2008 1775 145.8 +2.16 -1.96 0.948 49.3% -80 -27 -102 49.6% -0.16 3–9 (25%) 17–16 (52%) — -1.86 2004 1545 109.2 -3.28 -1.51 0.808 46.2% +20 -80 +2 29.4% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) — +0.16
23 2009 1699 138.5 +0.14 -1.79 0.899 48.4% -66 +76 — 42.2% -0.63 5–6 (45%) 8–10 (44%) — -2.05 2005 1468 108.5 -0.35 -3.57 0.745 46.3% +26 — — 28.6% -1.00 0–2 0–2 — +0.50
24 2010 1673 123.9 -1.48 -2.28 0.836 46.4% -130 +148 — 33.3% -1.12 0–3 (0%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.61 2006 1582 128.9 +0.81 -3.33 0.835 47.0% -87 -146 +113 39.7% -0.46 3–1 (75%) 4–12 (25%) — -1.54
25 2011 1679 123.8 -1.26 -2.49 0.805 46.3% -108 +81 +96 36.7% -0.93 — 4–4 (50%) — -0.44 2007 1733 136.0 +2.07 -1.43 0.975 49.5% -133 -232 +160 51.4% +0.10 7–7 (50%) 10–13 (43%) — -1.38
26 2012 1713 127.3 -0.23 -1.02 0.877 47.7% -107 +38 +114 37.8% -1.03 1–1 5–2 (71%) — -0.65 2008 1646 139.7 +0.72 -3.30 0.869 48.1% +10 -169 +149 38.0% -0.56 10–6 (63%) 7–18 (28%) — -1.66
27 2013 1693 126.1 -1.20 -2.42 0.855 46.8% -60 +25 — 43.3% -0.77 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.13 2009 1634 116.4 +1.22 +0.45 1.133 52.1% — — +194 52.6% +0.42 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.02
28 2014 1744 131.5 +2.15 -1.19 0.981 49.0% -78 +17 +83 45.7% -0.52 3–3 (50%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.20 2010 1663 119.6 +0.80 -3.07 0.879 48.7% -81 — +172 41.4% -0.41 1–3 (25%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.59
29 2015 1874 157.5 +2.49 -0.19 1.057 50.9% -60 0 -28 53.5% +0.16 8–8 (50%) 13–13 (50%) — -3.63 2011 1776 139.1 +1.77 +0.87 1.085 51.4% 0 — -11 51.9% +0.54 2–2 (50%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.18
30 2016 1792 125.5 -1.80 -4.48 0.729 46.0% -65 — — 29.2% -1.54 0–1 4–2 (67%) — -0.64 2012 1758 146.6 +0.71 -2.00 0.908 48.7% -26 -191 +12 47.3% -0.12 4–3 (57%) 9–8 (53%) — -1.76
31 2017 1802 128.3 -0.83 -0.46 0.850 48.0% — — — 38.9% -0.72 0–1 0–2 — -0.45 2013 1853 136.9 +4.19 +0.90 1.267 53.8% -98 — +138 67.3% +1.11 1–2 (33%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.94
32 2018 1788 126.3 +1.16 +0.59 1.003 50.3% — +93 — 50.0% -0.04 2–1 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.61 2014 1665 136.4 -0.71 -2.67 0.911 48.4% -1 -159 +232 40.9% -0.33 4–5 (44%) 9–12 (43%) — +0.82
33 2019 1737 109.6 -1.97 -2.79 0.700 44.5% -17 — — 22.2% -1.55 — 0–1 — +0.08 2015 1767 136.4 -0.11 +0.13 0.976 49.7% -83 -165 +250 55.0% -0.22 2–5 (29%) 11–2 (85%) — +0.49
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1872 149.7 +1.33 -0.93 1.009 50.1% -84 -256 +228 52.4% +0.15 7–4 (64%) 9–11 (45%) — +1.44
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1754 138.7 +0.15 -2.13 0.929 49.1% +26 -152 +157 42.5% -0.46 6–7 (46%) 9–5 (64%) — +0.80
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1708 129.0 -0.69 -0.86 0.916 48.2% +41 — — 33.3% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.03
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1707 120.2 +0.99 -0.41 1.000 50.7% — -37 +125 54.5% +0.55 2–1 (67%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.13
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1668 101.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1629 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1932 141.2 +0.75 -1.74 0.911 48.5% -70 +37 +10 43.7% -0.51 26–37 (41%) 71–68 (51%) 98.2 -4.54 — 1930 140.6 +0.77 -1.60 0.946 49.2% -34 -161 +146 45.4% -0.20 54–57 (49%) 90–120 (43%) 97.9 -0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.