H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Simone Bolelli vs Steve Darcis H2H: 1-0
Simone Bolelli holds a 1–0 lead over Steve Darcis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Simone Bolelli leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Simone Bolelli won the 2015 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2015* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Simone Bolelli | 6-3 6-4 6-3 | Steve Darcis | Match data |
| Oct 24, 2011 | Vienna | ATP 500 | Q2 | Hard | Steve Darcis | 7-5 3-6 6-4 | Simone Bolelli | Match data |
| Oct 12, 2008 | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Steve Darcis | 7-6(4) 7-6(2) | Simone Bolelli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simone Bolelli | #1,391 | #36 | 1,686 | 1,920 | 114 | 156 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Steve Darcis | #756 | #38 | 1,362 | 1,832 | 92 | 122 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Simone Bolelli | Steve Darcis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #127 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2007 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #67 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2008 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #41 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #483 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #93 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #86 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2010 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #107 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #61 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2011 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #122 | 1,564 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2012 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #84 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2013 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #245 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #88 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2014 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #55 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2015 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,865 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #164 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2016 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #464 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #86 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #141 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #86 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #334 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #77 | 1,799 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #157 | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |
| 39 | 2025 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |