H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Simone Bolelli vs Takao Suzuki H2H: 0-1

Takao Suzuki holds a 1–0 lead over Simone Bolelli in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Takao Suzuki leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Takao Suzuki won the 2008 Japan Open second round 7-6(5) 4-6 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Simone Bolelli
ITA Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Takao Suzuki
JPN Age 49 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Takao Suzuki #593 7-6(5) 4-6 7-6(5) Simone Bolelli #46 Match data Oct 2, 2008* R32 Japan Open International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Simone Bolelli #1,391 #36 1,686 1,931 113 157 41.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Takao Suzuki #1,016 #102 470 1,669 23 34 40.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Simone Bolelli Takao Suzuki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1995 0–2 0.0% #487 1,473 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1996 1–1 50.0% #517 1,493 0 0
20 2006 0–4 0.0% #127 1,465 0 0 1997 1–1 50.0% #272 1,506 0 0
21 2007 8–14 36.4% #67 1,601 0 0 1998 2–2 50.0% #115 1,544 0 0
22 2008 26–28 48.1% #41 1,775 0 0 1999 1–9 10.0% #262 1,462 0 0
23 2009 14–22 38.9% #93 1,698 0 0 2000 1–1 50.0% #160 1,477 0 0
24 2010 5–11 31.2% #107 1,672 0 0 2001 3–2 60.0% #225 1,516 0 0
25 2011 4–8 33.3% #134 1,679 0 0 2002 2–4 33.3% #136 1,506 0 0
26 2012 6–10 37.5% #84 1,713 0 0 2003 4–3 57.1% #205 1,609 0 0
27 2013 6–8 42.9% #245 1,693 0 0 2004 2–3 40.0% #212 1,610 0 0
28 2014 6–8 42.9% #55 1,744 0 0 2005 1–2 33.3% #272 1,588 0 0
29 2015 28–25 52.8% #58 1,874 0 0 2006 3–1 75.0% #471 1,619 0 0
30 2016 2–8 20.0% #464 1,791 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #241 1,543 0 0
31 2017 2–4 33.3% #171 1,801 0 0 2008 2–1 66.7% #509 1,543 0 0
32 2018 5–4 55.6% #141 1,788 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #282 1,541 0 0
33 2019 1–3 25.0% #334 1,736 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Simone Bolelli Takao Suzuki
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 3 6 9 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1998 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 12 18 30 40.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1999 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 2009 6 13 19 31.6% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2000 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 0 5 5 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — 2001 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2002 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2012 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2003 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 2013 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2014 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2005 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 16 15 31 51.6% 9 7 16 56.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2006 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2008 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 46 80 126 36.5% 50 59 109 45.9% 16 16 32 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — 22 29 51 43.1% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 266/270 of Simone Bolelli's and 24/24 of Takao Suzuki's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Simone Bolelli Takao Suzuki
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2006 4/4 4.0 0.8 61.9% 62.3% 51.2% 60.8% 21.9% 58.5% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 22/22 4.5 1.1 65.5% 68.7% 52.3% 48.4% 46.5% 63.0% 29.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 53/54 5.0 1.4 66.9% 70.0% 54.6% 67.0% 39.3% 64.9% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 35/36 4.7 1.4 62.8% 69.0% 52.1% 63.8% 34.1% 62.8% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 16/16 3.4 1.5 67.1% 66.4% 44.3% 48.6% 45.6% 59.2% 34.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 12/12 3.1 0.4 69.6% 62.8% 52.8% 55.1% 51.6% 59.7% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2012 16/16 2.9 2.0 64.9% 69.4% 46.3% 52.2% 50.5% 61.5% 33.7% 2003 7/7 7.7 3.1 58.1% 73.1% 52.8% 74.9% 39.7% 65.0% 34.3%
27 2013 14/14 3.6 1.7 63.1% 66.1% 51.9% 38.0% 43.4% 61.0% 33.4% 2004 5/5 11.8 3.8 62.6% 75.8% 48.5% 49.7% 52.6% 65.6% 32.4%
28 2014 14/14 5.7 2.6 64.7% 70.3% 59.7% 44.0% 31.9% 66.1% 33.2% 2005 3/3 10.3 2.7 64.5% 73.2% 58.4% 82.3% 63.9% 67.6% 29.6%
29 2015 52/53 4.2 1.6 66.7% 72.3% 56.2% 63.8% 47.2% 66.8% 35.1% 2006 4/4 12.8 2.5 62.7% 80.9% 66.7% 87.5% 50.0% 75.5% 29.2%
30 2016 9/10 5.9 1.7 65.1% 66.8% 49.0% 60.6% 44.0% 60.3% 28.9% 2007 1/1 12.0 4.0 54.3% 76.5% 60.5% 50.0% 14.3% 69.1% 32.4%
31 2017 6/6 2.5 1.0 73.1% 61.7% 58.7% 62.5% 45.4% 60.9% 33.2% 2008 3/3 12.0 2.3 60.0% 77.6% 50.9% 68.4% 44.4% 66.4% 33.0%
32 2018 9/9 2.0 1.1 76.5% 65.6% 52.5% 65.5% 35.4% 62.1% 37.9% 2009 1/1 4.0 2.0 60.9% 57.1% 72.2% 0.0% 0.0% 63.0% 26.7%
33 2019 4/4 1.8 1.0 68.3% 62.6% 53.1% 50.6% 66.7% 59.4% 28.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 266/270 4.2 1.5 66.3% 68.8% 53.1% 58.4% 42.5% 63.4% 33.3% — 24/57 10.3 3.0 60.8% 75.0% 55.8% 67.7% 45.0% 67.5% 31.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Simone Bolelli Takao Suzuki
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1473 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.09
19 2005 1496 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1493 109.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.16
20 2006 1465 108.7 -0.66 -0.84 0.803 46.1% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–2 1–3 (25%) — -0.29 1997 1507 105.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.04
21 2007 1602 127.2 +0.03 -4.56 0.806 47.1% -42 -20 — 34.6% -0.88 1–1 4–6 (40%) — -1.31 1998 1545 118.3 — — — — +30 — — 44.4% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.29
22 2008 1775 145.8 +2.16 -1.96 0.948 49.3% -80 -27 -102 49.6% -0.16 3–9 (25%) 17–16 (52%) — -1.86 1999 1462 115.1 — — — — +53 — — 30.0% -1.20 0–4 (0%) 1–6 (14%) — -0.13
23 2009 1699 138.5 +0.14 -1.79 0.899 48.4% -66 +76 — 42.2% -0.63 5–6 (45%) 8–10 (44%) — -2.05 2000 1477 103.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.83 1–1 — — +0.17
24 2010 1673 123.9 -1.48 -2.28 0.836 46.4% -130 +148 — 33.3% -1.12 0–3 (0%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.61 2001 1517 105.7 — — — — +20 — — 50.0% -0.21 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.26
25 2011 1679 123.8 -1.26 -2.49 0.805 46.3% -108 +81 +96 36.7% -0.93 — 4–4 (50%) — -0.44 2002 1506 104.2 — — — — +14 — — 35.7% -0.93 1–1 1–1 — +0.27
26 2012 1713 127.3 -0.23 -1.02 0.877 47.7% -107 +38 +114 37.8% -1.03 1–1 5–2 (71%) — -0.65 2003 1609 114.1 -2.01 -0.21 0.982 49.9% -33 — — 56.3% -0.13 — 4–1 (80%) — +0.23
27 2013 1693 126.1 -1.20 -2.42 0.855 46.8% -60 +25 — 43.3% -0.77 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.13 2004 1611 113.5 +1.14 -2.01 0.942 49.1% +12 — — 42.9% -0.86 1–1 4–2 (67%) — -0.08
28 2014 1744 131.5 +2.15 -1.19 0.981 49.0% -78 +17 +83 45.7% -0.52 3–3 (50%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.20 2005 1588 114.1 -0.19 +2.68 0.913 49.3% +55 — — 44.4% +0.22 0–1 0–1 — -0.25
29 2015 1874 157.5 +2.49 -0.19 1.057 50.9% -60 0 -28 53.5% +0.16 8–8 (50%) 13–13 (50%) — -3.63 2006 1619 124.5 +2.96 -0.08 1.193 53.1% +51 — — 63.6% +1.28 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.05
30 2016 1792 125.5 -1.80 -4.48 0.729 46.0% -65 — — 29.2% -1.54 0–1 4–2 (67%) — -0.64 2007 1544 100.8 -3.25 +0.61 1.049 50.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — -0.05
31 2017 1802 128.3 -0.83 -0.46 0.850 48.0% — — — 38.9% -0.72 0–1 0–2 — -0.45 2008 1543 102.7 +1.12 -0.43 0.981 50.2% +54 — — 62.5% -0.13 1–1 3–0 (100%) — +0.15
32 2018 1788 126.3 +1.16 +0.59 1.003 50.3% — +93 — 50.0% -0.04 2–1 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.61 2009 1541 112.1 +2.43 +1.00 0.722 42.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.10
33 2019 1737 109.6 -1.97 -2.79 0.700 44.5% -17 — — 22.2% -1.55 — 0–1 — +0.08 2010 1546 106.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1528 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1512 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1508 95.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1932 141.2 +0.75 -1.74 0.911 48.5% -70 +37 +10 43.7% -0.51 26–37 (41%) 71–68 (51%) 98.2 -4.54 — 1669 118.5 +0.23 -0.15 0.981 49.9% +27 — — 43.2% -0.56 9–11 (45%) 18–15 (55%) 105.7 +0.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.