H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Simone Bolelli vs Tatsuma Ito H2H: 1-0
Simone Bolelli holds a 1–0 lead over Tatsuma Ito in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Simone Bolelli leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Simone Bolelli won the 2014 Wimbledon first round 7-5 7-6(3) 3-6 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2019 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Q1 | Hard | Tatsuma Ito | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Simone Bolelli | Match data |
| Jun 25, 2014* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Simone Bolelli | 7-5 7-6(3) 3-6 7-6(5) | Tatsuma Ito | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simone Bolelli | #1,391 | #36 | 1,686 | 1,920 | 114 | 156 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tatsuma Ito | #1,822 | #60 | 725 | 1,726 | 28 | 56 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Simone Bolelli | Tatsuma Ito | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #127 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #67 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #41 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #93 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #107 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #155 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #84 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #245 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #119 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #55 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #171 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2015 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,865 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2016 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #464 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #147 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #141 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #186 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #334 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2025 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |