H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Simone Bolelli vs Thomaz Bellucci H2H: 2-1
Simone Bolelli holds a 2–1 lead over Thomaz Bellucci in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Simone Bolelli leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Thomaz Bellucci leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Simone Bolelli won the 2015 Indian Wells Masters first round 6-2 6-7(3) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2015* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Simone Bolelli | 6-2 6-7(3) 6-4 | Thomaz Bellucci | Match data |
| Jul 22, 2010* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Thomaz Bellucci | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | Simone Bolelli | Match data |
| Sep 25, 2008* | Bangkok | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Simone Bolelli | 6-3 6-3 | Thomaz Bellucci | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simone Bolelli | #1,391 | #36 | 1,686 | 1,920 | 114 | 156 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thomaz Bellucci | #1,303 | #21 | 1,732 | 1,937 | 179 | 201 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Simone Bolelli | Thomaz Bellucci | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #127 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #85 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #67 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #36 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2008 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #41 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2009 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #93 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #37 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2010 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #107 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2011 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #125 | 1,676 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2012 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #84 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #65 | 1,818 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2013 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #245 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #37 | 1,856 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2014 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #55 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #61 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2015 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,865 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2016 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #464 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #225 | 1,654 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #141 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #334 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,610 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1303 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 |
| 39 | 2025 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |