H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Agustin Calleri H2H: 0-1
Agustin Calleri holds a 1–0 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Agustin Calleri leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Agustin Calleri won the 2004 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 49
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2004* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Agustin Calleri | 6-1 6-3 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Agustin Calleri | #894 | #16 | 1,405 | 1,902 | 199 | 182 | 52.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Agustin Calleri | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #62 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #67 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #50 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 2003 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #24 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 2005 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #29 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #42 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #60 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #391 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 |