H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs Albert Costa H2H: 3-4

Albert Costa holds a 4–3 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Albert Costa leads 4–0 on clay, while Sjeng Schalken leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2000 Indian Wells Masters fourth round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sjeng Schalken
NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Albert Costa
ESP Age 51 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 18, 2000* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Sjeng Schalken #64 6-2 6-3 Albert Costa #13 Match data
Mar 7, 1998* Scottsdale ATP 250 QF Hard Sjeng Schalken #65 6-3 6-4 Albert Costa #22 Match data
Aug 23, 1997* Boston ATP 250 SF Hard Sjeng Schalken #79 6-4 5-7 6-3 Albert Costa #17 Match data
May 8, 1997* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Albert Costa #12 6-3 7-6(3) Sjeng Schalken #87 Match data
May 16, 1996* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Albert Costa #15 6-1 6-4 Sjeng Schalken #67 Match data
Apr 18, 1996* Barcelona ATP 250 R32 Clay Albert Costa #20 6-7(8) 7-6(7) 6-3 Sjeng Schalken #60 Match data
Oct 28, 1995* Santiago ATP 250 QF Clay Albert Costa #25 6-7(1) 7-5 6-3 Sjeng Schalken #56 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,934 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Albert Costa #669 #6 2,385 1,996 368 263 58.3% 1 1 0 0 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sjeng Schalken Albert Costa
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1 1993 2–2 50.0% #221 1,522 0 0
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2 1994 15–18 45.5% #52 1,583 0 0
20 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,632 0 3 1995 33–22 60.0% #24 1,758 0 1
21 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,592 0 3 1996 46–26 63.9% #13 1,750 0 4
22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4 1997 40–20 66.7% #19 1,830 0 6
23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,824 0 5 1998 47–26 64.4% #14 1,759 0 8
24 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,846 0 6 1999 40–22 64.5% #18 1,810 0 11
25 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 2000 29–22 56.9% #26 1,779 0 11
26 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,826 0 9 2001 27–22 55.1% #40 1,807 0 11
27 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 2002 32–22 59.3% #9 1,796 1 12
28 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,664 0 9 2003 23–20 53.5% #25 1,767 1 12
29 — — — — — — — 2004 19–22 46.3% #56 1,668 1 12
30 — — — — — — — 2005 13–17 43.3% #116 1,619 1 12
31 — — — — — — — 2006 2–2 50.0% #623 1,631 1 12