H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Alberto Martin H2H: 0-2
Alberto Martin holds a 2–0 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Alberto Martin leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Alberto Martin won the 2003 Rome Masters second round 2-6 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2003* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Alberto Martin | 2-6 6-3 6-1 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
| Apr 17, 2002* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Alberto Martin | 7-6(1) 6-2 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Alberto Martin | #1,023 | #34 | 1,008 | 1,799 | 218 | 267 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Alberto Martin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #226 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #111 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #105 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,721 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #79 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #41 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #54 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #68 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 2005 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 2006 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 2007 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #143 | 1,623 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #100 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #128 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #243 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |