H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Andrei Medvedev H2H: 0-2
Andrei Medvedev holds a 2–0 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrei Medvedev leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrei Medvedev won the 1998 Ostrava third round 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 51
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 1998* | Ostrava | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Andrei Medvedev | 6-0 6-4 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
| Jan 10, 1998* | Doha | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Andrei Medvedev | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Andrei Medvedev | #679 | #4 | 2,755 | 2,022 | 303 | 211 | 58.9% | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Andrei Medvedev | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1007 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #227 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 32–12 | 72.7% | #24 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 58–24 | 70.7% | #6 | 1,943 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #15 | 1,816 | 0 | 8 |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 39–26 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,769 | 0 | 9 |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #35 | 1,775 | 0 | 10 |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #27 | 1,776 | 0 | 11 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,708 | 0 | 11 |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #30 | 1,722 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #58 | 1,774 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 2001 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #156 | 1,627 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |