H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs Andrei Olhovskiy H2H: 1-0

Sjeng Schalken holds a 1–0 lead over Andrei Olhovskiy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sjeng Schalken leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 1998 Moscow round of 32 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sjeng Schalken
NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Andrei Olhovskiy
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sjeng Schalken #68 7-5 6-4 Andrei Olhovskiy #1325 Match data Nov 12, 1998* R32 Moscow ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,928 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 1 8 9
Andrei Olhovskiy #1,310 #49 690 1,731 116 163 41.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sjeng Schalken Andrei Olhovskiy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,633 0 3 — — — — — — —
21 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,598 0 3 1987 0–2 0.0% #232 1,470 0 0
22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4 1988 6–8 42.9% #86 1,519 0 0
23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,823 0 5 1989 4–10 28.6% #302 1,509 0 0
24 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,837 0 6 1990 4–4 50.0% #148 1,567 0 0
25 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 1991 4–10 28.6% #136 1,513 0 0
26 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,822 0 9 1992 16–18 47.1% #80 1,639 0 0
27 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 1993 26–29 47.3% #65 1,662 0 1
28 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,663 0 9 1994 23–27 46.0% #97 1,671 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1995 12–21 36.4% #118 1,586 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1996 21–19 52.5% #90 1,695 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1997 0–14 0.0% #442 1,492 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #1256 1,481 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sjeng Schalken Andrei Olhovskiy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 10 10 20 50.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 11 11 22 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 11 15 26 42.3% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1987 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1999 17 16 33 51.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1988 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2000 28 17 45 62.2% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1989 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2001 21 15 36 58.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1990 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
25 2002 12 16 28 42.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 12 2 14 85.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1991 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2003 23 13 36 63.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 10 2 12 83.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1992 5 7 12 41.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
27 2004 11 12 23 47.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1993 5 12 17 29.4% 4 9 13 30.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 13 5 18 72.2%
28 2005 3 6 9 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 7 10 17 41.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 10 6 16 62.5%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 147 133 280 52.5% 61 66 127 48.0% 47 30 77 61.0% 25 25 50 50.0% — 30 61 91 33.0% 16 36 52 30.8% 23 23 46 50.0% 47 43 90 52.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 466/534 of Sjeng Schalken's and 209/241 of Andrei Olhovskiy's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sjeng Schalken Andrei Olhovskiy
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1994 3/3 3.0 3.7 61.3% 70.8% 53.2% 74.5% 29.2% 64.2% 32.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 29/31 4.6 4.3 60.7% 70.0% 46.7% 57.7% 43.2% 60.7% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 44/52 4.6 4.8 56.9% 70.5% 48.1% 62.4% 44.7% 60.7% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 33/41 4.2 4.4 58.4% 67.0% 50.3% 56.9% 42.2% 59.7% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 41/52 4.3 3.3 59.6% 69.6% 49.3% 59.2% 45.2% 61.2% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 46/54 3.5 3.6 62.0% 69.6% 46.4% 53.6% 48.0% 60.6% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2000 53/61 5.3 4.5 56.0% 72.1% 51.2% 57.8% 41.9% 62.7% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2001 53/63 4.0 3.5 60.9% 70.2% 53.1% 54.8% 45.9% 63.4% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2002 52/63 3.1 2.8 66.8% 69.0% 52.9% 53.7% 39.0% 63.6% 38.3% 1991 11/14 4.6 4.6 54.5% 68.7% 43.3% 45.8% 38.1% 57.2% 34.9%
26 2003 60/62 2.7 2.0 67.1% 69.2% 56.7% 56.1% 51.7% 64.7% 40.7% 1992 34/34 5.6 4.1 54.4% 74.1% 50.1% 54.5% 38.5% 63.1% 37.8%
27 2004 35/35 2.6 1.6 73.8% 65.8% 54.7% 55.7% 37.5% 62.8% 36.1% 1993 45/55 6.8 3.3 57.9% 74.4% 48.4% 56.1% 34.0% 63.4% 37.0%
28 2005 17/17 1.5 1.6 71.1% 61.8% 51.4% 55.1% 41.2% 58.8% 38.4% 1994 46/50 9.6 5.1 55.7% 75.3% 48.5% 53.6% 44.2% 63.5% 35.8%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 30/33 8.2 3.7 56.8% 73.7% 48.4% 57.7% 29.0% 62.8% 35.3%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 30/40 8.3 4.8 56.3% 75.4% 47.6% 63.7% 38.3% 63.3% 34.4%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 12/14 10.7 5.5 52.7% 70.8% 45.8% 60.2% 31.0% 59.0% 32.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 1/1 3.0 1.0 67.8% 62.5% 57.9% 0.0% 100.0% 61.0% 34.2%
Career — 466/534 3.8 3.4 62.5% 69.2% 51.3% 56.7% 44.1% 62.1% 38.5% — 209/279 7.7 4.3 56.0% 74.0% 48.2% 56.0% 37.2% 62.7% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sjeng Schalken Andrei Olhovskiy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1994 1502 103.3 +0.17 -1.45 0.912 48.2% — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 1646 131.2 +0.48 -0.33 0.990 49.8% -114 +64 -77 50.0% -0.04 9–4 (69%) 6–3 (67%) 108.9 +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1688 137.5 -0.72 -1.26 0.929 49.0% -25 +3 -110 50.4% -0.08 10–8 (56%) 6–13 (32%) 100.0 +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 1634 136.5 -1.45 -0.70 0.889 47.9% +9 +9 -55 43.8% -0.37 5–7 (42%) 8–10 (44%) 99.7 -1.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 1598 132.0 -0.55 +0.75 0.978 50.0% +23 +20 -38 44.9% -0.20 8–13 (38%) 12–11 (52%) 93.5 +1.65 1987 1471 102.0 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.07
22 1999 1745 148.3 -0.52 +2.39 1.015 50.3% -3 -76 -122 51.7% +0.08 8–12 (40%) 9–8 (53%) 98.1 -2.44 1988 1519 108.6 — — — — -34 — +107 45.7% -0.66 0–1 2–2 (50%) — +1.54
23 2000 1823 145.8 +1.00 +1.26 1.036 50.5% +28 -171 -172 55.8% +0.34 12–9 (57%) 9–6 (60%) 105.1 +0.15 1989 1509 111.6 — — — — -2 -18 — 33.3% -0.93 4–4 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 102.3 +0.23
24 2001 1838 142.0 +0.82 +2.43 1.108 51.7% -14 -117 -151 53.6% +0.32 14–11 (56%) 7–13 (35%) 99.3 +1.67 1990 1568 127.2 — — — — +6 — — 55.0% +0.45 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.41
25 2002 1839 143.2 +1.06 +1.20 1.052 50.5% -32 -125 +41 55.2% +0.36 11–7 (61%) 17–18 (49%) 102.6 +0.32 1991 1513 111.9 -2.55 -1.87 0.815 46.2% -30 — +200 32.5% -0.95 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 101.9 +0.66
26 2003 1822 140.9 +2.08 +3.20 1.152 52.4% -22 -111 +167 61.2% +0.65 6–6 (50%) 13–4 (76%) 102.4 +1.00 1992 1639 134.2 +1.24 +0.43 1.025 50.2% -51 -113 +131 49.4% -0.09 4–7 (36%) 12–7 (63%) 104.4 -0.10
27 2004 1698 129.8 -0.34 -0.21 0.972 49.3% -14 -22 +251 53.7% +0.41 4–3 (57%) 5–5 (50%) 97.3 +1.66 1993 1662 134.3 +1.97 -1.09 1.010 49.5% +17 -124 +94 48.1% -0.26 9–10 (47%) 12–11 (52%) 103.3 -0.58
28 2005 1664 127.0 -2.29 +0.67 0.930 48.5% +5 +11 — 41.5% -0.51 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.0 -1.00 1994 1672 128.7 +1.65 -1.73 0.981 49.6% +4 -106 +40 47.0% -0.23 11–12 (48%) 7–16 (30%) 96.1 +1.82
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1587 124.1 +0.08 -2.77 0.951 49.1% +39 -62 +77 41.3% -0.43 2–3 (40%) 5–9 (36%) 95.2 +0.70
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1696 125.1 +0.74 -2.13 0.940 49.1% -13 -175 -15 50.5% +0.12 10–8 (56%) 11–14 (44%) 100.4 +1.43
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1493 110.3 -2.20 -3.61 0.788 45.9% +37 — — 19.4% -1.58 0–7 (0%) 3–6 (33%) 90.9 +0.18
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1482 100.8 -0.17 -0.96 0.878 45.9% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.07
Career — 1928 144.9 +0.24 +1.08 1.018 50.3% -6 -38 +4 52.2% +0.15 90–84 (52%) 93–94 (50%) 100.6 +0.52 — 1732 130.9 +0.85 -1.56 0.961 49.1% +1 -104 +85 44.1% -0.36 44–57 (44%) 57–74 (44%) 98.2 +2.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.