H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Bohdan Ulihrach H2H: 1-3
Bohdan Ulihrach holds a 3–1 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Bohdan Ulihrach leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Bohdan Ulihrach won the 2001 Munich fourth round 5-7 6-3 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2001* | Munich | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Bohdan Ulihrach | 5-7 6-3 7-6(6) | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
| Oct 9, 1997* | Vienna | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Bohdan Ulihrach | 6-2 6-2 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
| Aug 1, 1996* | Amsterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Bohdan Ulihrach | 7-5 4-6 6-0 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
| Oct 6, 1995* | Valencia | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Sjeng Schalken | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | Bohdan Ulihrach | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Bohdan Ulihrach | #805 | #22 | 1,399 | 1,841 | 218 | 236 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Bohdan Ulihrach | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #28 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #34 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 31–28 | 52.5% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #107 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #76 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 2001 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #32 | 1,772 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 2002 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #75 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #285 | 1,559 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |