H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Brett Steven H2H: 1-1
Sjeng Schalken and Brett Steven are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Brett Steven leads 1–0 on clay, while Sjeng Schalken leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 1999 Auckland semifinal 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
NZL
Age 57
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 1999* | Auckland | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Sjeng Schalken | 6-4 6-4 | Brett Steven | Match data |
| May 14, 1998* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Brett Steven | 2-6 6-3 6-1 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Brett Steven | #1,173 | #32 | 964 | 1,853 | 157 | 152 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Brett Steven | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #870 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #556 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #357 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #497 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #213 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #226 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #73 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 30–28 | 51.7% | #43 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #87 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 1995 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #42 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 1996 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #100 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 1997 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #50 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #92 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #206 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |