H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs Christophe Rochus H2H: 6-0

Sjeng Schalken holds a 6–0 lead over Christophe Rochus in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Sjeng Schalken leads 3–0 on grass and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2003 S Hertogenbosch fourth round 6-0 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sjeng Schalken
NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
6 – 0
6 main draw meetings
Christophe Rochus
BEL Age 47 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 20, 2003* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 R16 Grass Sjeng Schalken #12 6-0 6-0 Christophe Rochus #91 Match data
Feb 20, 2003* Rotterdam ATP 250 R32 Hard Sjeng Schalken #19 6-3 6-3 Christophe Rochus #136 Match data
Jun 21, 2002* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 R16 Grass Sjeng Schalken #31 4-6 7-6(1) 6-3 Christophe Rochus #86 Match data
Jul 19, 2001* Amsterdam ATP 250 R32 Clay Sjeng Schalken #32 6-3 6-4 Christophe Rochus #72 Match data
Oct 19, 2000* Shanghai ATP 250 R32 Hard Sjeng Schalken #34 6-2 6-4 Christophe Rochus #68 Match data
Jun 30, 2000* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Sjeng Schalken #53 6-4 6-3 6-1 Christophe Rochus #89 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,934 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Christophe Rochus #998 #38 1,248 1,740 114 208 35.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sjeng Schalken Christophe Rochus
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,632 0 3 1999 1–2 33.3% #121 1,502 0 0
21 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,592 0 3 2000 14–22 38.9% #74 1,555 0 0
22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4 2001 14–21 40.0% #69 1,617 0 0
23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,824 0 5 2002 10–21 32.3% #143 1,516 0 0
24 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,846 0 6 2003 12–18 40.0% #84 1,573 0 0
25 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 2004 9–18 33.3% #113 1,561 0 0
26 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,826 0 9 2005 18–26 40.9% #41 1,554 0 0
27 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 2006 15–26 36.6% #78 1,538 0 0
28 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,664 0 9 2007 2–9 18.2% #194 1,609 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2008 5–7 41.7% #69 1,689 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2009 14–28 33.3% #86 1,610 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2010 0–10 0.0% #249 1,551 0 0