H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs Dick Norman H2H: 1-1

Sjeng Schalken and Dick Norman are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dick Norman leads 1–0 on grass, while Sjeng Schalken leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2004 Cincinnati Open round of 64 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sjeng Schalken
NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Dick Norman
BEL Age 55 Left-Handed 203 cm / 6'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sjeng Schalken #25 6-4 6-3 Dick Norman #157 Match data Aug 4, 2004* R64 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Dick Norman #189 6-0 6-4 Sjeng Schalken #85 Match data Jun 15, 1995* R32 Libéma Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,928 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 1 8 9
Dick Norman #882 #85 456 1,629 27 66 29.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sjeng Schalken Dick Norman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,633 0 3 — — — — — — —
21 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,598 0 3 1992 0–1 0.0% #501 1,489 0 0
22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4 1993 1–1 50.0% #377 1,504 0 0
23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,823 0 5 — — — — — — —
24 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,837 0 6 1995 7–7 50.0% #115 1,612 0 0
25 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 1996 1–10 9.1% #237 1,493 0 0
26 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,822 0 9 1997 4–4 50.0% #116 1,562 0 0
27 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 1998 0–3 0.0% #569 1,529 0 0
28 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,663 0 9 — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #171 1,483 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2002 1–5 16.7% #96 1,524 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2003 3–7 30.0% #127 1,574 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2004 1–7 12.5% #166 1,488 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2005 2–9 18.2% #108 1,495 0 0
35 — — — — — — — 2006 3–9 25.0% #121 1,497 0 0
36 — — — — — — — 2007 3–1 75.0% #157 1,507 0 0
38 — — — — — — — 2009 1–1 50.0% #304 1,547 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sjeng Schalken Dick Norman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 10 10 20 50.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 11 11 22 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 11 15 26 42.3% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1992 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1999 17 16 33 51.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1993 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 2000 28 17 45 62.2% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2001 21 15 36 58.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1995 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 2002 12 16 28 42.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 12 2 14 85.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1996 0 6 6 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2003 23 13 36 63.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 10 2 12 83.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1997 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2004 11 12 23 47.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1998 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 3 6 9 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 147 133 280 52.5% 61 66 127 48.0% 47 30 77 61.0% 25 25 50 50.0% — 6 27 33 18.2% 5 15 20 25.0% 12 17 29 41.4% 4 7 11 36.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 466/534 of Sjeng Schalken's and 90/93 of Dick Norman's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sjeng Schalken Dick Norman
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1994 3/3 3.0 3.7 61.3% 70.8% 53.2% 74.5% 29.2% 64.2% 32.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 29/31 4.6 4.3 60.7% 70.0% 46.7% 57.7% 43.2% 60.7% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 44/52 4.6 4.8 56.9% 70.5% 48.1% 62.4% 44.7% 60.7% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 33/41 4.2 4.4 58.4% 67.0% 50.3% 56.9% 42.2% 59.7% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 41/52 4.3 3.3 59.6% 69.6% 49.3% 59.2% 45.2% 61.2% 37.9% 1992 1/1 9.0 4.0 61.0% 70.0% 34.4% 69.2% 50.0% 56.1% 31.9%
22 1999 46/54 3.5 3.6 62.0% 69.6% 46.4% 53.6% 48.0% 60.6% 40.0% 1993 1/2 3.0 6.0 55.6% 76.7% 41.7% 60.0% 0.0% 61.1% 26.2%
23 2000 53/61 5.3 4.5 56.0% 72.1% 51.2% 57.8% 41.9% 62.7% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2001 53/63 4.0 3.5 60.9% 70.2% 53.1% 54.8% 45.9% 63.4% 40.6% 1995 13/14 9.0 6.0 59.4% 79.6% 52.0% 68.3% 20.2% 68.3% 34.2%
25 2002 52/63 3.1 2.8 66.8% 69.0% 52.9% 53.7% 39.0% 63.6% 38.3% 1996 11/11 8.5 6.6 57.5% 72.2% 45.2% 57.1% 30.8% 60.6% 28.9%
26 2003 60/62 2.7 2.0 67.1% 69.2% 56.7% 56.1% 51.7% 64.7% 40.7% 1997 8/8 8.5 4.8 60.2% 74.0% 45.6% 55.2% 30.8% 63.3% 33.8%
27 2004 35/35 2.6 1.6 73.8% 65.8% 54.7% 55.7% 37.5% 62.8% 36.1% 1998 3/3 7.7 5.0 57.6% 68.2% 51.5% 53.3% 49.2% 61.0% 30.6%
28 2005 17/17 1.5 1.6 71.1% 61.8% 51.4% 55.1% 41.2% 58.8% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 1/1 5.0 7.0 54.7% 68.6% 44.8% 70.0% 0.0% 57.8% 23.5%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 5/6 9.8 9.0 55.8% 74.8% 47.2% 51.7% 47.6% 62.2% 28.9%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 10/10 14.4 6.1 61.7% 76.2% 51.7% 67.3% 32.6% 66.8% 31.2%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 8/8 8.0 5.0 57.6% 71.4% 44.9% 57.7% 51.7% 60.2% 27.5%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 11/11 11.5 5.0 60.4% 70.9% 45.6% 50.8% 34.2% 60.5% 31.5%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 12/12 11.0 6.8 62.6% 69.3% 44.4% 68.5% 32.2% 60.2% 33.3%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 4/4 10.5 6.0 65.7% 81.2% 54.8% 75.0% 28.1% 72.4% 29.5%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 2/2 14.5 9.0 48.2% 83.9% 66.0% 66.7% 54.2% 74.7% 34.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sjeng Schalken Dick Norman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1994 1502 103.3 +0.17 -1.45 0.912 48.2% — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 1646 131.2 +0.48 -0.33 0.990 49.8% -114 +64 -77 50.0% -0.04 9–4 (69%) 6–3 (67%) — +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1688 137.5 -0.72 -1.26 0.929 49.0% -25 +3 -110 50.4% -0.08 10–8 (56%) 6–13 (32%) — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 1634 136.5 -1.45 -0.70 0.889 47.9% +9 +9 -55 43.8% -0.37 5–7 (42%) 8–10 (44%) — -1.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 1598 132.0 -0.55 +0.75 0.978 50.0% +23 +20 -38 44.9% -0.20 8–13 (38%) 12–11 (52%) — +1.65 1992 1490 99.5 -1.13 +0.76 0.728 44.8% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.04
22 1999 1745 148.3 -0.52 +2.39 1.015 50.3% -3 -76 -122 51.7% +0.08 8–12 (40%) 9–8 (53%) — -2.44 1993 1505 100.8 +0.63 +2.13 0.674 42.6% — — — 50.0% +0.25 — 1–0 — +0.01
23 2000 1823 145.8 +1.00 +1.26 1.036 50.5% +28 -171 -172 55.8% +0.34 12–9 (57%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2001 1838 142.0 +0.82 +2.43 1.108 51.7% -14 -117 -151 53.6% +0.32 14–11 (56%) 7–13 (35%) — +1.67 1995 1612 127.0 +3.58 -1.29 1.079 50.9% -83 — +107 48.4% 0.00 0–1 2–5 (29%) — -0.15
25 2002 1839 143.2 +1.06 +1.20 1.052 50.5% -32 -125 +41 55.2% +0.36 11–7 (61%) 17–18 (49%) — +0.32 1996 1494 111.3 -1.80 -4.45 0.733 45.8% -24 — — 24.1% -1.59 0–4 (0%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.26
26 2003 1822 140.9 +2.08 +3.20 1.152 52.4% -22 -111 +167 61.2% +0.65 6–6 (50%) 13–4 (76%) — +1.00 1997 1562 110.4 +1.22 -1.81 0.923 48.7% -64 +7 — 45.0% -0.60 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.04
27 2004 1698 129.8 -0.34 -0.21 0.972 49.3% -14 -22 +251 53.7% +0.41 4–3 (57%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.66 1998 1529 106.5 +1.51 -0.73 0.783 46.1% -44 — — 14.3% -1.72 0–1 0–1 — 0.00
28 2005 1664 127.0 -2.29 +0.67 0.930 48.5% +5 +11 — 41.5% -0.51 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) — -1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1483 102.0 +0.20 -3.87 0.558 42.6% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.03
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1524 110.9 +0.66 -3.38 0.765 46.5% +34 — — 23.5% -1.29 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.27
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1575 125.2 +2.70 -2.35 0.940 49.4% -39 — +73 39.3% -0.36 0–4 (0%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.89
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1488 103.0 -0.18 -4.77 0.691 45.1% +4 +55 — 21.1% -1.37 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.12
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1495 108.2 -0.81 -4.63 0.798 46.1% -37 +41 +140 29.0% -1.13 1–3 (25%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.58
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1498 113.2 -1.61 -2.49 0.835 47.5% -26 +53 — 36.1% -0.92 1–3 (25%) 2–4 (33%) — 0.00
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1508 104.5 -0.23 +0.53 1.069 51.0% — — +120 63.6% +0.36 2–1 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.40
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1470 94.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1548 108.2 -0.32 +0.18 1.371 54.2% — — — 60.0% +0.60 0–1 — — +0.25
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1521 100.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1928 144.9 +0.24 +1.08 1.018 50.3% -6 -38 +4 52.2% +0.15 90–84 (52%) 93–94 (50%) 100.6 +0.52 — 1629 117.5 +0.44 -2.67 0.855 47.8% -37 +42 +110 35.1% -0.82 7–22 (24%) 17–32 (35%) 86.1 +0.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.