H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Dick Norman H2H: 1-1
Sjeng Schalken and Dick Norman are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dick Norman leads 1–0 on grass, while Sjeng Schalken leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2004 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 55
Left-Handed
203 cm / 6'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2004* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Sjeng Schalken | 6-4 6-3 | Dick Norman | Match data |
| Jun 15, 1995* | Rosmalen | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Dick Norman | 6-0 6-4 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Dick Norman | #882 | #85 | 456 | 1,629 | 27 | 66 | 29.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Dick Norman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #501 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #377 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #237 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 1997 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #569 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #166 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #108 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #157 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #304 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |