H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs Fabrice Santoro H2H: 3-0

Sjeng Schalken holds a 3–0 lead over Fabrice Santoro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sjeng Schalken leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2004 Dubai fourth round 5-7 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sjeng Schalken
NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Fabrice Santoro
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 5, 2004* Dubai ATP 250 R16 Hard Sjeng Schalken #15 5-7 6-4 6-4 Fabrice Santoro #73 Match data
May 30, 2003* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Sjeng Schalken #13 6-1 6-3 6-4 Fabrice Santoro #54 Match data
Feb 28, 2003* Dubai ATP 250 R16 Hard Sjeng Schalken #15 3-6 7-6(2) 7-6(5) Fabrice Santoro #33 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,934 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,889 456 432 51.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sjeng Schalken Fabrice Santoro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0
18 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2 1992 25–22 53.2% #43 1,728 0 0
20 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,632 0 3 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,628 0 0
21 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,592 0 3 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,734 0 0
22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,609 0 0
23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,824 0 5 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,555 0 0
24 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,846 0 6 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,804 0 1
25 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,709 0 1
26 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,826 0 9 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2
27 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 2000 32–26 55.2% #31 1,727 0 3
28 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,664 0 9 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,739 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2004 17–14 54.8% #52 1,817 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,782 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,700 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,785 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,755 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,694 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,688 0 6