H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Fernando Meligeni H2H: 0-1
Fernando Meligeni holds a 1–0 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fernando Meligeni leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Meligeni won the 1995 Montevideo third round 4-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 55
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 1995* | Montevideo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Fernando Meligeni | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Fernando Meligeni | #675 | #25 | 1,316 | 1,888 | 185 | 199 | 48.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Fernando Meligeni | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #169 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #99 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #91 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #64 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #94 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 1997 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #67 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 1998 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #57 | 1,655 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 1999 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #29 | 1,685 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #71 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #74 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #210 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 |