H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Fernando Vicente H2H: 1-2
Fernando Vicente holds a 2–1 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Fernando Vicente leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2003 Indian Wells Masters second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2003* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Sjeng Schalken | 6-2 6-3 | Fernando Vicente | Match data |
| Jan 5, 2001* | Doha | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Fernando Vicente | 6-1 5-7 6-1 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
| Mar 27, 1998* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Fernando Vicente | (w/o) | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Fernando Vicente | #1,019 | #29 | 993 | 1,762 | 158 | 212 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Fernando Vicente | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #49 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 23–31 | 42.6% | #47 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,637 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #58 | 1,618 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 2003 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #63 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #187 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #110 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #111 | 1,461 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,508 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,484 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,489 | 0 | 3 |