H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs Galo Blanco H2H: 3-1

Sjeng Schalken holds a 3–1 lead over Galo Blanco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Sjeng Schalken leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2002 ASB Classic round of 32 6-2 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sjeng Schalken
NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Galo Blanco
ESP Age 49 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sjeng Schalken #29 6-2 3-6 6-3 Galo Blanco #56 Match data Jan 10, 2002* R32 ASB Classic ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Galo Blanco #78 6-3 6-3 Sjeng Schalken #49 Match data Feb 10, 2000* R32 Dubai Tennis Championships ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Sjeng Schalken #47 7-6(8) 6-4 7-6(2) Galo Blanco #77 Match data Jan 19, 2000* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Sjeng Schalken #65 6-3 7-6(4) Galo Blanco #56 Match data Mar 5, 1998* R32 Scottsdale ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,928 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 1 8 9
Galo Blanco #809 #40 963 1,751 122 175 41.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sjeng Schalken Galo Blanco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0 1994 0–1 0.0% #470 1,489 0 0
18 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1 1995 3–4 42.9% #164 1,520 0 0
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2 1996 11–16 40.7% #97 1,542 0 0
20 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,633 0 3 1997 16–20 44.4% #52 1,594 0 0
21 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,598 0 3 1998 20–25 44.4% #82 1,623 0 0
22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4 1999 14–19 42.4% #75 1,622 0 1
23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,823 0 5 2000 12–20 37.5% #114 1,571 0 1
24 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,837 0 6 2001 20–23 46.5% #56 1,632 0 1
25 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 2002 8–19 29.6% #134 1,573 0 1
26 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,822 0 9 2003 10–9 52.6% #99 1,625 0 1
27 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 2004 7–15 31.8% #174 1,556 0 1
28 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,663 0 9 2005 0–3 0.0% #315 1,499 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2006 1–1 50.0% #822 1,510 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sjeng Schalken Galo Blanco
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1995 — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
19 1996 10 10 20 50.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 11 14 25 44.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1997 11 11 22 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1997 1 6 7 14.3% 15 14 29 51.7% — — — — — — — —
21 1998 11 15 26 42.3% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1998 3 5 8 37.5% 17 18 35 48.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1999 17 16 33 51.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1999 1 6 7 14.3% 12 12 24 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 2000 28 17 45 62.2% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2000 3 6 9 33.3% 9 13 22 40.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2001 21 15 36 58.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 2001 1 6 7 14.3% 19 13 32 59.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 2002 12 16 28 42.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 12 2 14 85.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2002 0 6 6 0.0% 8 12 20 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2003 23 13 36 63.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 10 2 12 83.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2003 — — — — 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — — — — —
27 2004 11 12 23 47.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2004 1 2 3 33.3% 6 12 18 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2005 3 6 9 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 147 133 280 52.5% 61 66 127 48.0% 47 30 77 61.0% 25 25 50 50.0% — 10 39 49 20.4% 111 126 237 46.8% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 466/534 of Sjeng Schalken's and 256/297 of Galo Blanco's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sjeng Schalken Galo Blanco
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1994 3/3 3.0 3.7 61.3% 70.8% 53.2% 74.5% 29.2% 64.2% 32.7% 1994 1/1 5.0 6.0 60.0% 68.3% 47.6% 54.5% 60.0% 60.0% 39.3%
18 1995 29/31 4.6 4.3 60.7% 70.0% 46.7% 57.7% 43.2% 60.7% 38.9% 1995 5/7 1.4 1.4 64.6% 57.5% 50.3% 52.1% 37.7% 54.7% 39.6%
19 1996 44/52 4.6 4.8 56.9% 70.5% 48.1% 62.4% 44.7% 60.7% 36.5% 1996 21/27 3.2 3.1 63.2% 64.8% 45.5% 51.5% 43.3% 57.8% 36.0%
20 1997 33/41 4.2 4.4 58.4% 67.0% 50.3% 56.9% 42.2% 59.7% 35.9% 1997 30/36 4.0 3.5 57.0% 66.2% 48.9% 61.4% 48.8% 58.6% 35.1%
21 1998 41/52 4.3 3.3 59.6% 69.6% 49.3% 59.2% 45.2% 61.2% 37.9% 1998 37/45 4.1 2.5 55.0% 67.3% 49.0% 58.3% 33.2% 59.1% 37.7%
22 1999 46/54 3.5 3.6 62.0% 69.6% 46.4% 53.6% 48.0% 60.6% 40.0% 1999 28/33 5.0 3.3 52.3% 71.8% 51.6% 53.7% 42.2% 62.0% 34.8%
23 2000 53/61 5.3 4.5 56.0% 72.1% 51.2% 57.8% 41.9% 62.7% 38.7% 2000 25/32 5.5 3.1 53.5% 70.2% 49.8% 53.9% 46.1% 60.6% 37.6%
24 2001 53/63 4.0 3.5 60.9% 70.2% 53.1% 54.8% 45.9% 63.4% 40.6% 2001 39/43 5.3 2.8 49.1% 70.2% 50.2% 54.5% 39.6% 59.8% 35.9%
25 2002 52/63 3.1 2.8 66.8% 69.0% 52.9% 53.7% 39.0% 63.6% 38.3% 2002 24/27 4.4 2.7 54.2% 69.4% 46.9% 51.4% 34.3% 58.9% 33.9%
26 2003 60/62 2.7 2.0 67.1% 69.2% 56.7% 56.1% 51.7% 64.7% 40.7% 2003 19/19 3.1 3.1 59.8% 67.7% 49.7% 58.9% 51.6% 60.4% 41.7%
27 2004 35/35 2.6 1.6 73.8% 65.8% 54.7% 55.7% 37.5% 62.8% 36.1% 2004 22/22 4.0 3.2 56.1% 65.5% 46.4% 46.6% 41.8% 57.2% 34.2%
28 2005 17/17 1.5 1.6 71.1% 61.8% 51.4% 55.1% 41.2% 58.8% 38.4% 2005 3/3 3.7 1.0 59.2% 68.3% 35.1% 51.9% 21.3% 55.6% 36.9%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 2/2 7.0 4.5 56.5% 60.7% 37.1% 61.5% 55.6% 50.6% 43.2%
Career — 466/534 3.8 3.4 62.5% 69.2% 51.3% 56.7% 44.1% 62.1% 38.5% — 256/297 4.4 3.0 55.2% 68.0% 48.6% 54.8% 41.5% 59.2% 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sjeng Schalken Galo Blanco
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1994 1502 103.3 +0.17 -1.45 0.912 48.2% — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.03 1994 1489 102.5 +1.68 -1.21 0.982 49.3% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.01
18 1995 1646 131.2 +0.48 -0.33 0.990 49.8% -114 +64 -77 50.0% -0.04 9–4 (69%) 6–3 (67%) 108.9 +0.54 1995 1520 110.8 +0.35 -0.38 0.875 46.8% — +40 — 41.2% -1.12 2–1 (67%) — — +0.03
19 1996 1688 137.5 -0.72 -1.26 0.929 49.0% -25 +3 -110 50.4% -0.08 10–8 (56%) 6–13 (32%) 100.0 +0.30 1996 1542 126.0 -1.80 -1.86 0.852 47.2% — +52 — 42.0% -0.48 6–7 (46%) 3–2 (60%) 101.2 -0.19
20 1997 1634 136.5 -1.45 -0.70 0.889 47.9% +9 +9 -55 43.8% -0.37 5–7 (42%) 8–10 (44%) 99.7 -1.14 1997 1594 126.7 -1.14 -2.43 0.848 47.4% -141 +84 — 44.3% -0.59 5–2 (71%) 11–6 (65%) 108.5 +0.09
21 1998 1598 132.0 -0.55 +0.75 0.978 50.0% +23 +20 -38 44.9% -0.20 8–13 (38%) 12–11 (52%) 93.5 +1.65 1998 1624 134.1 -1.64 -0.67 0.921 48.4% -141 +70 — 47.2% -0.37 5–9 (36%) 9–8 (53%) 97.2 -0.79
22 1999 1745 148.3 -0.52 +2.39 1.015 50.3% -3 -76 -122 51.7% +0.08 8–12 (40%) 9–8 (53%) 98.1 -2.44 1999 1622 132.6 -0.14 -2.04 0.917 48.9% -157 +95 — 44.7% -0.30 1–5 (17%) 8–4 (67%) 99.6 -0.11
23 2000 1823 145.8 +1.00 +1.26 1.036 50.5% +28 -171 -172 55.8% +0.34 12–9 (57%) 9–6 (60%) 105.1 +0.15 2000 1572 121.3 -1.13 -0.80 0.955 49.0% -84 +49 — 38.7% -0.68 5–5 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 99.1 +0.81
24 2001 1838 142.0 +0.82 +2.43 1.108 51.7% -14 -117 -151 53.6% +0.32 14–11 (56%) 7–13 (35%) 99.3 +1.67 2001 1632 136.9 -1.42 -1.79 0.893 48.0% -176 +135 — 45.0% -0.46 6–4 (60%) 13–9 (59%) 108.0 -1.90
25 2002 1839 143.2 +1.06 +1.20 1.052 50.5% -32 -125 +41 55.2% +0.36 11–7 (61%) 17–18 (49%) 102.6 +0.32 2002 1573 120.3 -1.73 -2.20 0.825 46.8% -154 +100 — 32.1% -1.04 1–3 (25%) 5–5 (50%) 98.2 -0.61
26 2003 1822 140.9 +2.08 +3.20 1.152 52.4% -22 -111 +167 61.2% +0.65 6–6 (50%) 13–4 (76%) 102.4 +1.00 2003 1626 127.4 -1.42 +1.17 1.055 51.2% — +70 — 61.4% +0.75 2–5 (29%) 3–2 (60%) 96.6 +1.19
27 2004 1698 129.8 -0.34 -0.21 0.972 49.3% -14 -22 +251 53.7% +0.41 4–3 (57%) 5–5 (50%) 97.3 +1.66 2004 1556 114.8 -3.59 -3.00 0.797 45.9% -122 +75 — 30.2% -1.34 2–1 (67%) 2–7 (22%) 97.8 +0.09
28 2005 1664 127.0 -2.29 +0.67 0.930 48.5% +5 +11 — 41.5% -0.51 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.0 -1.00 2005 1499 100.6 -2.64 -3.20 0.831 45.6% — +58 — 0.0% -2.17 — 0–1 — +0.04
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1511 108.9 -1.85 -4.97 0.875 47.3% — — — 50.0% -0.84 1–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.08
Career — 1928 144.9 +0.24 +1.08 1.018 50.3% -6 -38 +4 52.2% +0.15 90–84 (52%) 93–94 (50%) 100.6 +0.52 — 1752 133.6 -1.47 -1.57 0.892 48.0% -140 +81 — 42.7% -0.54 36–44 (45%) 62–51 (55%) 104.3 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.