H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Galo Blanco H2H: 3-1
Sjeng Schalken holds a 3–1 lead over Galo Blanco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Sjeng Schalken leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2002 Auckland third round 6-2 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2002* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Sjeng Schalken | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Galo Blanco | Match data |
| Feb 10, 2000* | Dubai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Galo Blanco | 6-3 6-3 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
| Jan 19, 2000* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Sjeng Schalken | 7-6(8) 6-4 7-6(2) | Galo Blanco | Match data |
| Mar 5, 1998* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Sjeng Schalken | 6-3 7-6(4) | Galo Blanco | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Galo Blanco | #809 | #40 | 963 | 1,750 | 122 | 175 | 41.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Galo Blanco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #164 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #82 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #75 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #114 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #56 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #134 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 2003 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #99 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #174 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #822 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |