H2H data updated: 2026-10-20 00:00 UTC
Sjeng Schalken holds a 2–0 lead over Gaston Etlis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sjeng Schalken leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2003 Costa Do Sauipe semifinal 6-1 2-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | 6-1 2-0 (ret.) | Gaston Etlis | Match data | Sep 13, 2003* | SF | Costa Do Sauipe | ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Sjeng Schalken | 6-1 3-6 6-4 | Gaston Etlis | Match data | Sep 13, 1996* | R16 | Bogota | World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,928 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 9 |
| Gaston Etlis | #1,490 | #114 | 378 | 1,577 | 29 | 55 | 34.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Gaston Etlis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #207 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #133 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #197 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #132 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,823 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #153 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,837 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #168 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,822 | 0 | 9 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 2002 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,663 | 0 | 9 | 2003 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #227 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Gaston Etlis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1994 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1994 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 1995 | — | — | — | — | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 11 | 15 | 26 | 42.3% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1996 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 17 | 16 | 33 | 51.5% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1997 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 23 | 2000 | 28 | 17 | 45 | 62.2% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2001 | 21 | 15 | 36 | 58.3% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1999 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 2002 | 12 | 16 | 28 | 42.9% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 12 | 2 | 14 | 85.7% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 2000 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2003 | 23 | 13 | 36 | 63.9% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 10 | 2 | 12 | 83.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2001 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2004 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2003 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 147 | 133 | 280 | 52.5% | 61 | 66 | 127 | 48.0% | 47 | 30 | 77 | 61.0% | 25 | 25 | 50 | 50.0% | — | 13 | 16 | 29 | 44.8% | 14 | 36 | 50 | 28.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 466/534 of Sjeng Schalken's and 11/11 of Gaston Etlis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Gaston Etlis | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | 1994 | 3/3 | 3.0 | 3.7 | 61.3% | 70.8% | 53.2% | 74.5% | 29.2% | 64.2% | 32.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 29/31 | 4.6 | 4.3 | 60.7% | 70.0% | 46.7% | 57.7% | 43.2% | 60.7% | 38.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 44/52 | 4.6 | 4.8 | 56.9% | 70.5% | 48.1% | 62.4% | 44.7% | 60.7% | 36.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 33/41 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 58.4% | 67.0% | 50.3% | 56.9% | 42.2% | 59.7% | 35.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 41/52 | 4.3 | 3.3 | 59.6% | 69.6% | 49.3% | 59.2% | 45.2% | 61.2% | 37.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 46/54 | 3.5 | 3.6 | 62.0% | 69.6% | 46.4% | 53.6% | 48.0% | 60.6% | 40.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2000 | 53/61 | 5.3 | 4.5 | 56.0% | 72.1% | 51.2% | 57.8% | 41.9% | 62.7% | 38.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2001 | 53/63 | 4.0 | 3.5 | 60.9% | 70.2% | 53.1% | 54.8% | 45.9% | 63.4% | 40.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2002 | 52/63 | 3.1 | 2.8 | 66.8% | 69.0% | 52.9% | 53.7% | 39.0% | 63.6% | 38.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2003 | 60/62 | 2.7 | 2.0 | 67.1% | 69.2% | 56.7% | 56.1% | 51.7% | 64.7% | 40.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2004 | 35/35 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 73.8% | 65.8% | 54.7% | 55.7% | 37.5% | 62.8% | 36.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 17/17 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 71.1% | 61.8% | 51.4% | 55.1% | 41.2% | 58.8% | 38.4% | 2003 | 11/11 | 4.5 | 4.8 | 55.3% | 67.1% | 45.7% | 66.0% | 43.9% | 57.7% | 34.9% |
| Career | — | 466/534 | 3.8 | 3.4 | 62.5% | 69.2% | 51.3% | 56.7% | 44.1% | 62.1% | 38.5% | — | 11/84 | 4.5 | 4.8 | 55.3% | 67.1% | 45.7% | 66.0% | 43.9% | 57.7% | 34.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Gaston Etlis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1502 | 103.3 | +0.17 | -1.45 | 0.912 | 48.2% | — | — | — | 42.9% | -0.57 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 1646 | 131.2 | +0.48 | -0.33 | 0.990 | 49.8% | -114 | +64 | -77 | 50.0% | -0.04 | 9–4 (69%) | 6–3 (67%) | 108.9 | +0.54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 1688 | 137.5 | -0.72 | -1.26 | 0.929 | 49.0% | -25 | +3 | -110 | 50.4% | -0.08 | 10–8 (56%) | 6–13 (32%) | 100.0 | +0.30 | 1994 | 1485 | 110.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +46 | — | 27.3% | -1.55 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.07 |
| 20 | 1997 | 1634 | 136.5 | -1.45 | -0.70 | 0.889 | 47.9% | +9 | +9 | -55 | 43.8% | -0.37 | 5–7 (42%) | 8–10 (44%) | 99.7 | -1.14 | 1995 | 1507 | 120.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +30 | — | 47.1% | -0.38 | 0–6 (0%) | 1–1 | — | -0.13 |
| 21 | 1998 | 1598 | 132.0 | -0.55 | +0.75 | 0.978 | 50.0% | +23 | +20 | -38 | 44.9% | -0.20 | 8–13 (38%) | 12–11 (52%) | 93.5 | +1.65 | 1996 | 1467 | 122.0 | — | — | — | — | +60 | +4 | — | 30.3% | -1.15 | 1–5 (17%) | 1–5 (17%) | 94.5 | -0.19 |
| 22 | 1999 | 1745 | 148.3 | -0.52 | +2.39 | 1.015 | 50.3% | -3 | -76 | -122 | 51.7% | +0.08 | 8–12 (40%) | 9–8 (53%) | 98.1 | -2.44 | 1997 | 1517 | 115.8 | — | — | — | — | +55 | -5 | — | 47.2% | -0.17 | 0–1 | 4–4 (50%) | — | +1.49 |
| 23 | 2000 | 1823 | 145.8 | +1.00 | +1.26 | 1.036 | 50.5% | +28 | -171 | -172 | 55.8% | +0.34 | 12–9 (57%) | 9–6 (60%) | 105.1 | +0.15 | 1998 | 1550 | 111.2 | — | — | — | — | +54 | — | — | 62.5% | +0.12 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.20 |
| 24 | 2001 | 1838 | 142.0 | +0.82 | +2.43 | 1.108 | 51.7% | -14 | -117 | -151 | 53.6% | +0.32 | 14–11 (56%) | 7–13 (35%) | 99.3 | +1.67 | 1999 | 1512 | 100.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14.3% | -2.28 | 0–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.28 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1839 | 143.2 | +1.06 | +1.20 | 1.052 | 50.5% | -32 | -125 | +41 | 55.2% | +0.36 | 11–7 (61%) | 17–18 (49%) | 102.6 | +0.32 | 2000 | 1458 | 114.9 | — | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–5 (0%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.61 |
| 26 | 2003 | 1822 | 140.9 | +2.08 | +3.20 | 1.152 | 52.4% | -22 | -111 | +167 | 61.2% | +0.65 | 6–6 (50%) | 13–4 (76%) | 102.4 | +1.00 | 2001 | 1471 | 104.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 60.0% | +0.80 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.17 |
| 27 | 2004 | 1698 | 129.8 | -0.34 | -0.21 | 0.972 | 49.3% | -14 | -22 | +251 | 53.7% | +0.41 | 4–3 (57%) | 5–5 (50%) | 97.3 | +1.66 | 2002 | 1564 | 115.3 | — | — | — | — | +46 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.69 | 1–0 | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.12 |
| 28 | 2005 | 1664 | 127.0 | -2.29 | +0.67 | 0.930 | 48.5% | +5 | +11 | — | 41.5% | -0.51 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 99.0 | -1.00 | 2003 | 1560 | 111.0 | -3.19 | -1.08 | 0.826 | 47.3% | +60 | -100 | — | 44.0% | -0.08 | 4–1 (80%) | 1–4 (20%) | 101.8 | +0.30 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1542 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1928 | 144.9 | +0.24 | +1.08 | 1.018 | 50.3% | -6 | -38 | +4 | 52.2% | +0.15 | 90–84 (52%) | 93–94 (50%) | 100.6 | +0.52 | — | 1577 | 123.1 | -3.19 | -1.08 | 0.826 | 47.3% | +55 | 0 | — | 41.1% | -0.62 | 7–22 (24%) | 13–19 (41%) | 91.5 | +1.57 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan-Michael Gambill | 3 | 6 | 9 | Oct 16, 2003 | H2H |
| Carlos Moya | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jan 10, 2004 | H2H |
| Yevgeny Kafelnikov | 3 | 5 | 8 | May 3, 2003 | H2H |
| Gustavo Kuerten | 2 | 6 | 8 | Sep 4, 2002 | H2H |
| Mark Philippoussis | 3 | 5 | 8 | Aug 28, 2002 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Massu | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sep 12, 2002 | H2H |
| Sjeng Schalken | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 13, 2003 | H2H |
| Flavio Saretta | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 24, 2003 | H2H |
| Franco Squillari | 2 | 0 | 2 | Jul 23, 2003 | H2H |
| Younes El Aynaoui | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 17, 2003 | H2H |