H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs Gaston Gaudio H2H: 0-1

Gaston Gaudio holds a 1–0 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gaston Gaudio leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gaston Gaudio won the 2000 ASB Classic quarterfinal 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sjeng Schalken
NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Gaston Gaudio
ARG Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gaston Gaudio #72 6-1 6-2 Sjeng Schalken #37 Match data Jan 15, 2000* QF ASB Classic ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,928 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 1 8 9
Gaston Gaudio #1,025 #5 2,440 1,995 253 189 57.2% 1 0 0 2 5 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sjeng Schalken Gaston Gaudio
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,633 0 3 1999 8–15 34.8% #72 1,531 0 0
21 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,598 0 3 2000 27–25 51.9% #34 1,648 0 0
22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4 2001 23–23 50.0% #48 1,691 0 0
23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,823 0 5 2002 39–17 69.6% #21 1,828 0 2
24 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,837 0 6 2003 34–23 59.6% #34 1,764 0 2
25 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 2004 35–24 59.3% #10 1,805 1 3
26 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,822 0 9 2005 54–20 73.0% #10 1,869 1 8
27 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 2006 26–20 56.5% #34 1,697 1 8
28 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,663 0 9 2007 6–15 28.6% #182 1,625 1 8
29 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #969 1,605 1 8
30 — — — — — — — 2009 1–5 16.7% #167 1,525 1 8
31 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #326 1,467 1 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sjeng Schalken Gaston Gaudio
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 10 10 20 50.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 11 11 22 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1999 0 2 2 0.0% 8 12 20 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1998 11 15 26 42.3% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2000 6 9 15 40.0% 21 12 33 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1999 17 16 33 51.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2001 5 9 14 35.7% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 2000 28 17 45 62.2% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2002 12 9 21 57.1% 25 6 31 80.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2001 21 15 36 58.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 2003 6 9 15 40.0% 27 12 39 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2002 12 16 28 42.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 12 2 14 85.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2004 5 10 15 33.3% 29 12 41 70.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2003 23 13 36 63.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 10 2 12 83.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2005 8 9 17 47.1% 41 7 48 85.4% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
27 2004 11 12 23 47.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2006 5 6 11 45.5% 20 12 32 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2005 3 6 9 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 1 3 4 25.0% 5 12 17 29.4% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 147 133 280 52.5% 61 66 127 48.0% 47 30 77 61.0% 25 25 50 50.0% — 48 66 114 42.1% 193 103 296 65.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 10 14 24 41.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 466/534 of Sjeng Schalken's and 411/442 of Gaston Gaudio's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sjeng Schalken Gaston Gaudio
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1994 3/3 3.0 3.7 61.3% 70.8% 53.2% 74.5% 29.2% 64.2% 32.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 29/31 4.6 4.3 60.7% 70.0% 46.7% 57.7% 43.2% 60.7% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 44/52 4.6 4.8 56.9% 70.5% 48.1% 62.4% 44.7% 60.7% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 33/41 4.2 4.4 58.4% 67.0% 50.3% 56.9% 42.2% 59.7% 35.9% 1999 21/23 2.1 3.5 58.6% 61.3% 49.4% 54.6% 44.0% 56.2% 40.6%
21 1998 41/52 4.3 3.3 59.6% 69.6% 49.3% 59.2% 45.2% 61.2% 37.9% 2000 42/52 2.2 3.1 60.8% 66.4% 47.8% 56.3% 44.2% 59.0% 39.9%
22 1999 46/54 3.5 3.6 62.0% 69.6% 46.4% 53.6% 48.0% 60.6% 40.0% 2001 41/46 3.2 2.7 60.3% 68.6% 52.0% 60.6% 40.5% 62.0% 38.1%
23 2000 53/61 5.3 4.5 56.0% 72.1% 51.2% 57.8% 41.9% 62.7% 38.7% 2002 47/56 3.9 2.4 62.9% 70.4% 55.2% 57.1% 49.1% 64.4% 42.2%
24 2001 53/63 4.0 3.5 60.9% 70.2% 53.1% 54.8% 45.9% 63.4% 40.6% 2003 54/57 2.8 2.9 63.0% 67.1% 50.6% 52.2% 46.0% 61.0% 40.8%
25 2002 52/63 3.1 2.8 66.8% 69.0% 52.9% 53.7% 39.0% 63.6% 38.3% 2004 59/59 2.4 3.0 63.1% 68.5% 49.9% 57.0% 47.5% 61.7% 41.8%
26 2003 60/62 2.7 2.0 67.1% 69.2% 56.7% 56.1% 51.7% 64.7% 40.7% 2005 73/74 2.8 2.9 62.1% 68.4% 52.3% 60.7% 45.0% 62.2% 43.8%
27 2004 35/35 2.6 1.6 73.8% 65.8% 54.7% 55.7% 37.5% 62.8% 36.1% 2006 46/46 2.8 3.6 61.9% 68.2% 49.1% 55.6% 43.3% 61.0% 40.8%
28 2005 17/17 1.5 1.6 71.1% 61.8% 51.4% 55.1% 41.2% 58.8% 38.4% 2007 20/21 1.3 5.1 60.9% 62.6% 44.4% 44.9% 42.0% 55.4% 35.9%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/1 1.0 3.0 53.1% 30.8% 47.8% 33.3% 40.0% 38.8% 37.0%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 6/6 1.7 5.0 64.9% 62.2% 40.2% 53.9% 54.7% 54.8% 39.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 1/1 3.0 1.0 75.6% 63.2% 68.2% 81.8% 16.7% 64.4% 34.8%
Career — 466/534 3.8 3.4 62.5% 69.2% 51.3% 56.7% 44.1% 62.1% 38.5% — 411/442 2.7 3.1 62.0% 67.4% 50.5% 56.4% 45.1% 60.9% 41.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sjeng Schalken Gaston Gaudio
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1994 1502 103.3 +0.17 -1.45 0.912 48.2% — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 1646 131.2 +0.48 -0.33 0.990 49.8% -114 +64 -77 50.0% -0.04 9–4 (69%) 6–3 (67%) 108.9 +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1688 137.5 -0.72 -1.26 0.929 49.0% -25 +3 -110 50.4% -0.08 10–8 (56%) 6–13 (32%) 100.0 +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 1634 136.5 -1.45 -0.70 0.889 47.9% +9 +9 -55 43.8% -0.37 5–7 (42%) 8–10 (44%) 99.7 -1.14 1999 1532 120.2 -3.16 +1.21 0.925 48.6% — +61 — 33.3% -0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 96.9 -0.13
21 1998 1598 132.0 -0.55 +0.75 0.978 50.0% +23 +20 -38 44.9% -0.20 8–13 (38%) 12–11 (52%) 93.5 +1.65 2000 1648 139.2 -1.88 +1.92 0.975 49.6% -157 +157 — 50.8% -0.08 7–10 (41%) 10–4 (71%) 103.6 -0.67
22 1999 1745 148.3 -0.52 +2.39 1.015 50.3% -3 -76 -122 51.7% +0.08 8–12 (40%) 9–8 (53%) 98.1 -2.44 2001 1691 142.7 -0.10 +0.88 1.001 50.0% -102 +74 — 51.7% -0.01 6–11 (35%) 15–9 (63%) 101.7 +0.14
23 2000 1823 145.8 +1.00 +1.26 1.036 50.5% +28 -171 -172 55.8% +0.34 12–9 (57%) 9–6 (60%) 105.1 +0.15 2002 1828 154.5 +2.21 +3.81 1.188 53.1% -81 +154 — 64.1% +0.82 11–6 (65%) 13–9 (59%) 105.8 -0.72
24 2001 1838 142.0 +0.82 +2.43 1.108 51.7% -14 -117 -151 53.6% +0.32 14–11 (56%) 7–13 (35%) 99.3 +1.67 2003 1764 144.0 +0.25 +2.55 1.046 50.7% -73 +146 — 56.0% +0.41 17–10 (63%) 6–13 (32%) 96.5 +0.01
25 2002 1839 143.2 +1.06 +1.20 1.052 50.5% -32 -125 +41 55.2% +0.36 11–7 (61%) 17–18 (49%) 102.6 +0.32 2004 1806 148.5 +0.07 +4.61 1.092 51.5% -162 +199 — 58.0% +0.48 9–11 (45%) 9–12 (43%) 93.6 -1.50
26 2003 1822 140.9 +2.08 +3.20 1.152 52.4% -22 -111 +167 61.2% +0.65 6–6 (50%) 13–4 (76%) 102.4 +1.00 2005 1870 154.2 +0.77 +5.42 1.158 52.8% -146 +244 — 65.7% +0.95 16–6 (73%) 11–10 (52%) 105.3 +1.99
27 2004 1698 129.8 -0.34 -0.21 0.972 49.3% -14 -22 +251 53.7% +0.41 4–3 (57%) 5–5 (50%) 97.3 +1.66 2006 1697 131.9 -1.41 +2.09 1.047 50.8% -45 +240 — 55.4% +0.22 9–9 (50%) 7–6 (54%) 95.0 +3.39
28 2005 1664 127.0 -2.29 +0.67 0.930 48.5% +5 +11 — 41.5% -0.51 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.0 -1.00 2007 1626 110.3 -4.55 -0.35 0.804 45.1% -16 +88 — 31.5% -1.76 4–4 (50%) 1–1 — -0.67
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1605 96.3 -2.10 -4.49 0.605 37.9% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.14
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1525 113.6 -2.51 -0.87 0.865 46.9% — +95 — 25.0% -1.81 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.07
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1467 98.5 -3.63 -2.53 0.978 49.5% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.10
Career — 1928 144.9 +0.24 +1.08 1.018 50.3% -6 -38 +4 52.2% +0.15 90–84 (52%) 93–94 (50%) 100.6 +0.52 — 1995 147.2 -0.36 +2.93 1.049 50.8% -111 +165 — 54.9% +0.22 82–74 (53%) 74–69 (52%) 99.3 +0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.