H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs Goran Ivanisevic H2H: 3-0

Sjeng Schalken holds a 3–0 lead over Goran Ivanisevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sjeng Schalken leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2004 Rotterdam third round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sjeng Schalken
NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Goran Ivanisevic
CRO Age 54 Left-Handed 194 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 19, 2004* Rotterdam ATP 250 R32 Hard Sjeng Schalken #15 6-3 6-2 Goran Ivanisevic #582 Match data
Nov 9, 2000* St. Petersburg ATP 250 R32 Hard Sjeng Schalken #27 3-6 6-2 6-3 Goran Ivanisevic #124 Match data
Jan 13, 2000* Auckland ATP 250 R32 Hard Sjeng Schalken #37 6-1 4-6 6-4 Goran Ivanisevic #68 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,934 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Goran Ivanisevic #395 #2 3,572 2,124 561 316 64.0% 1 2 1 0 18 22

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sjeng Schalken Goran Ivanisevic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1988 1–3 25.0% #371 1,488 0 0
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0 1989 29–23 55.8% #40 1,691 0 0
18 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1 1990 46–22 67.6% #9 1,921 0 1
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2 1991 35–21 62.5% #16 1,922 0 2
20 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,632 0 3 1992 57–18 76.0% #4 2,090 0 6
21 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,592 0 3 1993 50–21 70.4% #7 2,031 0 9
22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4 1994 62–26 70.5% #5 1,976 0 11
23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,824 0 5 1995 41–22 65.1% #10 1,911 0 12
24 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,846 0 6 1996 76–24 76.0% #4 2,001 0 17
25 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 1997 51–20 71.8% #15 1,866 0 20
26 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,826 0 9 1998 44–28 61.1% #12 1,873 0 21
27 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 1999 22–26 45.8% #62 1,713 0 21
28 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,664 0 9 2000 11–21 34.4% #129 1,596 0 21
29 — — — — — — — 2001 28–21 57.1% #12 1,814 1 22
30 — — — — — — — 2002 4–7 36.4% #243 1,698 1 22
31 — — — — — — — 2003 0–3 0.0% #657 1,646 1 22
32 — — — — — — — 2004 4–10 28.6% #266 1,632 1 22