H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs Gregory Carraz H2H: 2-1

Sjeng Schalken holds a 2–1 lead over Gregory Carraz in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sjeng Schalken leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Gregory Carraz leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2004 Los Angeles Open round of 32 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sjeng Schalken
NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Gregory Carraz
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sjeng Schalken #22 6-4 6-4 Gregory Carraz #80 Match data Jul 15, 2004* R32 Los Angeles Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Gregory Carraz #74 6-4 2-6 6-3 Sjeng Schalken #13 Match data Oct 30, 2003* R32 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Carpet
Sjeng Schalken #13 7-5 6-4 Gregory Carraz #85 Match data Sep 12, 2003* R16 Costa Do Sauipe ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,928 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 1 8 9
Gregory Carraz #1,461 #54 663 1,713 35 54 39.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sjeng Schalken Gregory Carraz
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,633 0 3 — — — — — — —
21 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,598 0 3 1996 1–3 25.0% #312 1,495 0 0
22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4 1997 0–1 0.0% #373 1,490 0 0
23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,823 0 5 — — — — — — —
24 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,837 0 6 1999 0–1 0.0% #308 1,484 0 0
25 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 — — — — — — —
26 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,822 0 9 — — — — — — —
27 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 2002 2–5 28.6% #131 1,553 0 0
28 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,663 0 9 2003 14–12 53.8% #67 1,695 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2004 14–20 41.2% #90 1,616 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2005 4–11 26.7% #167 1,515 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2006 0–1 0.0% #273 1,477 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sjeng Schalken Gregory Carraz
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 10 10 20 50.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 11 11 22 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 11 15 26 42.3% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1996 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1999 17 16 33 51.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2000 28 17 45 62.2% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2001 21 15 36 58.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2002 12 16 28 42.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 12 2 14 85.7% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2003 23 13 36 63.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 10 2 12 83.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 11 12 23 47.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2005 3 6 9 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 9 9 18 50.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 10 13 23 43.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 147 133 280 52.5% 61 66 127 48.0% 47 30 77 61.0% 25 25 50 50.0% — 24 35 59 40.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 466/534 of Sjeng Schalken's and 88/89 of Gregory Carraz's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sjeng Schalken Gregory Carraz
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1994 3/3 3.0 3.7 61.3% 70.8% 53.2% 74.5% 29.2% 64.2% 32.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 29/31 4.6 4.3 60.7% 70.0% 46.7% 57.7% 43.2% 60.7% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 44/52 4.6 4.8 56.9% 70.5% 48.1% 62.4% 44.7% 60.7% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 33/41 4.2 4.4 58.4% 67.0% 50.3% 56.9% 42.2% 59.7% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 41/52 4.3 3.3 59.6% 69.6% 49.3% 59.2% 45.2% 61.2% 37.9% 1996 4/4 5.3 6.3 55.9% 67.1% 47.2% 41.7% 51.0% 57.2% 45.0%
22 1999 46/54 3.5 3.6 62.0% 69.6% 46.4% 53.6% 48.0% 60.6% 40.0% 1997 1/1 6.0 5.0 48.5% 71.9% 44.1% 50.0% 25.0% 57.6% 26.8%
23 2000 53/61 5.3 4.5 56.0% 72.1% 51.2% 57.8% 41.9% 62.7% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2001 53/63 4.0 3.5 60.9% 70.2% 53.1% 54.8% 45.9% 63.4% 40.6% 1999 1/1 4.0 5.0 46.9% 63.3% 41.2% 55.6% 0.0% 51.6% 26.7%
25 2002 52/63 3.1 2.8 66.8% 69.0% 52.9% 53.7% 39.0% 63.6% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2003 60/62 2.7 2.0 67.1% 69.2% 56.7% 56.1% 51.7% 64.7% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 35/35 2.6 1.6 73.8% 65.8% 54.7% 55.7% 37.5% 62.8% 36.1% 2002 7/7 13.3 9.6 56.0% 80.9% 44.5% 42.9% 51.3% 65.2% 34.0%
28 2005 17/17 1.5 1.6 71.1% 61.8% 51.4% 55.1% 41.2% 58.8% 38.4% 2003 26/26 12.3 7.4 60.3% 76.7% 49.6% 52.3% 47.9% 65.8% 33.9%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 33/34 10.1 6.1 62.1% 75.1% 48.9% 72.3% 35.5% 64.9% 31.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 15/15 11.0 5.3 58.6% 76.3% 41.6% 64.4% 38.7% 62.1% 31.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/1 18.0 9.0 57.7% 76.7% 47.7% 50.0% 14.3% 64.4% 28.1%
Career — 466/534 3.8 3.4 62.5% 69.2% 51.3% 56.7% 44.1% 62.1% 38.5% — 88/89 10.9 6.6 59.8% 75.7% 47.3% 60.6% 40.9% 64.2% 32.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sjeng Schalken Gregory Carraz
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1994 1502 103.3 +0.17 -1.45 0.912 48.2% — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 1646 131.2 +0.48 -0.33 0.990 49.8% -114 +64 -77 50.0% -0.04 9–4 (69%) 6–3 (67%) — +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1688 137.5 -0.72 -1.26 0.929 49.0% -25 +3 -110 50.4% -0.08 10–8 (56%) 6–13 (32%) — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 1634 136.5 -1.45 -0.70 0.889 47.9% +9 +9 -55 43.8% -0.37 5–7 (42%) 8–10 (44%) — -1.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 1598 132.0 -0.55 +0.75 0.978 50.0% +23 +20 -38 44.9% -0.20 8–13 (38%) 12–11 (52%) — +1.65 1996 1495 108.2 -1.39 +2.48 1.053 50.5% +34 — — 30.0% -0.50 0–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.19
22 1999 1745 148.3 -0.52 +2.39 1.015 50.3% -3 -76 -122 51.7% +0.08 8–12 (40%) 9–8 (53%) — -2.44 1997 1490 105.5 +2.36 -1.89 0.631 43.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.17
23 2000 1823 145.8 +1.00 +1.26 1.036 50.5% +28 -171 -172 55.8% +0.34 12–9 (57%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2001 1838 142.0 +0.82 +2.43 1.108 51.7% -14 -117 -151 53.6% +0.32 14–11 (56%) 7–13 (35%) — +1.67 1999 1484 100.9 -0.74 -1.20 0.551 41.3% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.06
25 2002 1839 143.2 +1.06 +1.20 1.052 50.5% -32 -125 +41 55.2% +0.36 11–7 (61%) 17–18 (49%) — +0.32 2000 1474 99.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2003 1822 140.9 +2.08 +3.20 1.152 52.4% -22 -111 +167 61.2% +0.65 6–6 (50%) 13–4 (76%) — +1.00 2001 1480 104.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 1698 129.8 -0.34 -0.21 0.972 49.3% -14 -22 +251 53.7% +0.41 4–3 (57%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.66 2002 1554 119.4 +1.58 -0.63 0.979 50.3% -24 — +54 40.0% -0.15 0–3 (0%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.50
28 2005 1664 127.0 -2.29 +0.67 0.930 48.5% +5 +11 — 41.5% -0.51 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) — -1.00 2003 1695 127.9 +3.11 -1.59 0.991 50.0% -26 — -63 47.9% +0.06 12–4 (75%) 9–5 (64%) — -0.57
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1616 129.8 +1.25 -3.63 0.898 48.4% +12 — +3 45.0% -0.26 6–6 (50%) 10–12 (45%) — +0.22
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1516 113.9 -1.11 -3.46 0.839 47.2% +33 — +68 30.6% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 4–9 (31%) — +0.14
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1477 100.4 -2.20 +0.28 0.791 47.0% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.12
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1476 103.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1928 144.9 +0.24 +1.08 1.018 50.3% -6 -38 +4 52.2% +0.15 90–84 (52%) 93–94 (50%) 100.6 +0.52 — 1713 125.7 +1.25 -2.39 0.918 48.8% +3 — +4 41.5% -0.34 19–19 (50%) 24–33 (42%) 100.0 -0.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.