H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs Guillaume Raoux H2H: 3-1

Sjeng Schalken holds a 3–1 lead over Guillaume Raoux in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Sjeng Schalken leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 1999 Lyon second round 7-6(5) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sjeng Schalken
NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Guillaume Raoux
FRA Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 20, 1999* Lyon ATP 250 R64 Carpet Sjeng Schalken #54 7-6(5) 6-2 Guillaume Raoux #107 Match data
Jun 19, 1998* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 R16 Grass Sjeng Schalken #55 6-2 7-5 Guillaume Raoux #38 Match data
Jun 21, 1997* Rosmalen ATP 250 QF Grass Guillaume Raoux #105 7-6(5) 6-4 Sjeng Schalken #81 Match data
Mar 24, 1995* Casablanca ATP 250 R16 Clay Sjeng Schalken #135 7-6(3) 2-6 6-1 Guillaume Raoux #136 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,934 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Guillaume Raoux #1,033 #35 1,041 1,806 175 222 44.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sjeng Schalken Guillaume Raoux
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1 1988 0–1 0.0% #448 1,492 0 0
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2 1989 1–6 14.3% #220 1,462 0 0
20 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,632 0 3 1990 6–9 40.0% #84 1,529 0 0
21 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,592 0 3 1991 14–25 35.9% #104 1,615 0 0
22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4 1992 14–16 46.7% #93 1,619 0 1
23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,824 0 5 1993 27–28 49.1% #85 1,627 0 1
24 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,846 0 6 1994 15–20 42.9% #115 1,572 0 1
25 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 1995 17–22 43.6% #77 1,566 0 1
26 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,826 0 9 1996 21–21 50.0% #72 1,630 0 1
27 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 1997 26–26 50.0% #47 1,728 0 1
28 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,664 0 9 1998 24–27 47.1% #53 1,735 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1999 10–19 34.5% #137 1,577 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2000 0–2 0.0% #668 1,553 0 1