H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs Hicham Arazi H2H: 1-4

Hicham Arazi holds a 4–1 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Hicham Arazi leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Hicham Arazi won the 2001 Lyon third round 2-6 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sjeng Schalken
NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Hicham Arazi
MAR Age 52 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 11, 2001* Lyon ATP 250 R32 Carpet Hicham Arazi #29 2-6 7-5 6-3 Sjeng Schalken #23 Match data
May 16, 2001* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Hicham Arazi #28 6-3 1-6 6-1 Sjeng Schalken #30 Match data
Oct 14, 2000* Tokyo ATP 250 SF Hard Sjeng Schalken #51 4-6 6-3 7-6(7) Hicham Arazi #41 Match data
May 10, 2000* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Hicham Arazi #29 6-3 6-2 Sjeng Schalken #44 Match data
Aug 5, 1999* Amsterdam ATP 250 R32 Clay Hicham Arazi #40 6-2 0-6 6-4 Sjeng Schalken #47 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,934 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Hicham Arazi #793 #22 1,240 1,864 202 213 48.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sjeng Schalken Hicham Arazi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,632 0 3 1994 0–1 0.0% #184 1,486 0 0
21 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,592 0 3 1995 1–5 16.7% #141 1,457 0 0
22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4 1996 12–16 42.9% #79 1,550 0 0
23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,824 0 5 1997 28–27 50.9% #38 1,624 0 1
24 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,846 0 6 1998 23–28 45.1% #36 1,714 0 1
25 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 1999 27–27 50.0% #36 1,702 0 1
26 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,826 0 9 2000 31–26 54.4% #30 1,775 0 1
27 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 2001 30–23 56.6% #25 1,833 0 1
28 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,664 0 9 2002 14–21 40.0% #90 1,699 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2003 21–20 51.2% #52 1,718 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2004 15–17 46.9% #62 1,711 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2005 0–2 0.0% #897 1,672 0 1