H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 2-1
Sjeng Schalken holds a 2–1 lead over Hyung-Taik Lee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sjeng Schalken leads 1–0 on clay, while Hyung-Taik Lee leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Hyung-Taik Lee won the 2004 Queen's Club fourth round 7-6(3) 6-7(6) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2004* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Hyung-Taik Lee | 7-6(3) 6-7(6) 6-3 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
| Aug 13, 2003* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Sjeng Schalken | 6-4 6-3 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
| Apr 17, 2003* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Sjeng Schalken | 7-5 6-2 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sjeng Schalken | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |