H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs James Blake H2H: 0-1

James Blake holds a 1–0 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, James Blake leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, James Blake won the 2003 Cincinnati Open round of 32 6-1 6-4.

NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 1
1 main draw meetings
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
James Blake #27 6-1 6-4 Sjeng Schalken #12 Match data Aug 14, 2003* R32 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,928 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 1 8 9
James Blake #1,020 #4 3,550 2,041 349 237 59.6% 0 0 0 1 9 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sjeng Schalken James Blake
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0
18 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1 1998 0–1 0.0% 1,491 0 0
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2 1999 1–4 20.0% #219 1,479 0 0
20 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,633 0 3 2000 0–4 0.0% #212 1,453 0 0
21 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,598 0 3 2001 11–9 55.0% #73 1,647 0 0
22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4 2002 34–22 60.7% #28 1,815 0 1
23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,823 0 5 2003 30–23 56.6% #37 1,794 0 1
24 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,837 0 6 2004 15–13 53.6% #97 1,692 0 1
25 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 2005 34–20 63.0% #23 1,924 0 3
26 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,822 0 9 2006 57–21 73.1% #4 1,999 0 8
27 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 2007 49–21 70.0% #13 1,916 0 10
28 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,663 0 9 2008 44–22 66.7% #10 1,883 0 10
29 2009 23–18 56.1% #44 1,849 0 10
30 2010 15–17 46.9% #135 1,759 0 10
31 2011 19–16 54.3% #59 1,824 0 10
32 2012 8–12 40.0% #127 1,781 0 10
33 2013 9–14 39.1% #153 1,711 0 10

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sjeng Schalken James Blake
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1998 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1996 10 10 20 50.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1999 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1997 11 11 22 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 2000 0 4 4 0.0%
21 1998 11 15 26 42.3% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2001 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
22 1999 17 16 33 51.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2002 21 12 33 63.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 2000 28 17 45 62.2% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2003 24 14 38 63.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2001 21 15 36 58.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 2004 12 9 21 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2002 12 16 28 42.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 12 2 14 85.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2005 28 13 41 68.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2003 23 13 36 63.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 10 2 12 83.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2006 46 14 60 76.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2004 11 12 23 47.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2007 40 15 55 72.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7%
28 2005 3 6 9 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 33 15 48 68.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
29 2009 13 11 24 54.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7%
30 2010 15 15 30 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 2011 18 14 32 56.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 2012 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2013 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
Career 147 133 280 52.5% 61 66 127 48.0% 47 30 77 61.0% 25 25 50 50.0% 273 164 437 62.5% 39 39 78 50.0% 32 27 59 54.2% 5 7 12 41.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 466/534 of Sjeng Schalken's and 563/586 of James Blake's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sjeng Schalken James Blake
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1994 3/3 3.0 3.7 61.3% 70.8% 53.2% 74.5% 29.2% 64.2% 32.7% —/—
18 1995 29/31 4.6 4.3 60.7% 70.0% 46.7% 57.7% 43.2% 60.7% 38.9% 1998 1/1 8.0 7.0 49.1% 60.4% 47.3% 66.7% 15.4% 53.7% 34.4%
19 1996 44/52 4.6 4.8 56.9% 70.5% 48.1% 62.4% 44.7% 60.7% 36.5% 1999 5/5 3.6 4.4 54.3% 64.1% 45.3% 41.7% 36.7% 55.8% 31.8%
20 1997 33/41 4.2 4.4 58.4% 67.0% 50.3% 56.9% 42.2% 59.7% 35.9% 2000 4/4 3.3 3.0 48.4% 58.5% 30.3% 35.4% 54.5% 44.2% 38.6%
21 1998 41/52 4.3 3.3 59.6% 69.6% 49.3% 59.2% 45.2% 61.2% 37.9% 2001 17/20 5.7 2.5 59.8% 71.7% 54.9% 64.8% 42.6% 64.8% 37.2%
22 1999 46/54 3.5 3.6 62.0% 69.6% 46.4% 53.6% 48.0% 60.6% 40.0% 2002 50/56 4.5 2.5 58.7% 71.0% 51.7% 62.3% 44.2% 63.1% 39.2%
23 2000 53/61 5.3 4.5 56.0% 72.1% 51.2% 57.8% 41.9% 62.7% 38.7% 2003 52/53 5.2 3.0 60.2% 71.5% 51.7% 56.1% 48.8% 63.6% 40.7%
24 2001 53/63 4.0 3.5 60.9% 70.2% 53.1% 54.8% 45.9% 63.4% 40.6% 2004 28/28 4.8 2.4 60.2% 70.7% 51.0% 51.0% 36.6% 63.0% 39.1%
25 2002 52/63 3.1 2.8 66.8% 69.0% 52.9% 53.7% 39.0% 63.6% 38.3% 2005 54/54 6.6 2.4 58.6% 74.9% 53.7% 62.7% 41.6% 66.2% 39.7%
26 2003 60/62 2.7 2.0 67.1% 69.2% 56.7% 56.1% 51.7% 64.7% 40.7% 2006 77/78 6.1 2.7 57.5% 73.3% 53.3% 61.1% 44.9% 64.8% 41.9%
27 2004 35/35 2.6 1.6 73.8% 65.8% 54.7% 55.7% 37.5% 62.8% 36.1% 2007 67/70 7.4 2.9 57.8% 76.8% 54.8% 62.3% 47.5% 67.4% 39.1%
28 2005 17/17 1.5 1.6 71.1% 61.8% 51.4% 55.1% 41.2% 58.8% 38.4% 2008 59/66 7.0 2.6 55.7% 75.0% 52.5% 54.6% 46.8% 65.0% 39.6%
29 —/— 2009 41/41 6.3 3.0 57.3% 74.0% 53.5% 60.6% 41.0% 65.3% 35.1%
30 —/— 2010 32/32 5.2 2.8 57.4% 72.1% 52.4% 53.6% 37.7% 63.7% 36.3%
31 —/— 2011 33/35 5.5 3.8 57.7% 74.1% 47.4% 61.0% 46.0% 62.8% 35.5%
32 —/— 2012 20/20 5.4 3.1 56.9% 71.3% 49.4% 51.8% 46.5% 62.0% 36.7%
33 —/— 2013 23/23 6.0 2.7 53.4% 75.6% 48.6% 58.9% 49.1% 62.6% 37.7%
Career 466/534 3.8 3.4 62.5% 69.2% 51.3% 56.7% 44.1% 62.1% 38.5% 563/586 6.0 2.8 57.7% 73.3% 52.1% 58.7% 44.5% 64.3% 38.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sjeng Schalken James Blake
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1994 1502 103.3 +0.17 -1.45 0.912 48.2% 42.9% -0.57 0–1 +0.03
18 1995 1646 131.2 +0.48 -0.33 0.990 49.8% -114 +64 -77 50.0% -0.04 9–4 (69%) 6–3 (67%) +0.54 1998 1492 98.2 +0.92 -1.01 0.743 44.6% 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 -0.01
19 1996 1688 137.5 -0.72 -1.26 0.929 49.0% -25 +3 -110 50.4% -0.08 10–8 (56%) 6–13 (32%) +0.30 1999 1480 105.6 -2.20 -0.63 0.718 44.0% +30 16.7% -2.42 1–0 0–1 -0.11
20 1997 1634 136.5 -1.45 -0.70 0.889 47.9% +9 +9 -55 43.8% -0.37 5–7 (42%) 8–10 (44%) -1.14 2000 1453 104.3 -4.21 +0.21 0.692 41.4% +17 0.0% -3.63 0–1 -0.23
21 1998 1598 132.0 -0.55 +0.75 0.978 50.0% +23 +20 -38 44.9% -0.20 8–13 (38%) 12–11 (52%) +1.65 2001 1647 135.3 +2.25 +0.39 1.059 51.0% -18 -87 55.1% +0.55 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) +0.08
22 1999 1745 148.3 -0.52 +2.39 1.015 50.3% -3 -76 -122 51.7% +0.08 8–12 (40%) 9–8 (53%) -2.44 2002 1816 147.9 +1.40 +2.12 1.061 51.1% -26 -178 -199 56.1% +0.32 11–10 (52%) 9–7 (56%) -0.19
23 2000 1823 145.8 +1.00 +1.26 1.036 50.5% +28 -171 -172 55.8% +0.34 12–9 (57%) 9–6 (60%) +0.15 2003 1794 146.7 +1.54 +3.57 1.120 52.2% +27 -165 -202 58.3% +0.52 6–12 (33%) 15–9 (63%) -0.97
24 2001 1838 142.0 +0.82 +2.43 1.108 51.7% -14 -117 -151 53.6% +0.32 14–11 (56%) 7–13 (35%) +1.67 2004 1692 126.8 -0.56 +1.37 1.056 50.9% +63 -67 55.1% +0.38 3–4 (43%) 7–3 (70%) +2.11
25 2002 1839 143.2 +1.06 +1.20 1.052 50.5% -32 -125 +41 55.2% +0.36 11–7 (61%) 17–18 (49%) +0.32 2005 1925 148.8 +3.11 +2.61 1.175 52.6% +27 -259 -338 61.2% +0.81 8–9 (47%) 10–15 (40%) -1.49
26 2003 1822 140.9 +2.08 +3.20 1.152 52.4% -22 -111 +167 61.2% +0.65 6–6 (50%) 13–4 (76%) +1.00 2006 2000 158.3 +2.59 +5.15 1.189 53.1% +48 -316 -257 64.5% +0.91 17–8 (68%) 18–14 (56%) +0.23
27 2004 1698 129.8 -0.34 -0.21 0.972 49.3% -14 -22 +251 53.7% +0.41 4–3 (57%) 5–5 (50%) +1.66 2007 1917 151.1 +3.35 +2.66 1.201 53.1% +45 -237 -153 66.3% +1.01 12–9 (57%) 20–16 (56%) +3.66
28 2005 1664 127.0 -2.29 +0.67 0.930 48.5% +5 +11 41.5% -0.51 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) -1.00 2008 1883 152.4 +2.01 +2.91 1.131 52.4% +72 -189 -110 61.9% +0.79 13–11 (54%) 12–11 (52%) +4.15
29 2009 1850 151.0 +2.02 +0.45 1.012 50.5% +25 -106 -16 53.8% +0.24 7–8 (47%) 14–11 (56%) -0.82
30 2010 1760 142.1 -0.13 0.00 1.000 50.0% +24 49.4% -0.01 6–9 (40%) 5–6 (45%) -0.97
31 2011 1825 150.5 -0.14 -0.22 0.954 49.7% +33 50.0% -0.01 6–5 (55%) 7–8 (47%) -0.57
32 2012 1781 139.4 -0.94 -0.30 0.965 49.4% +57 45.5% -0.34 2–6 (25%) 4–5 (44%) +0.24
33 2013 1712 137.4 -1.34 +1.25 1.009 50.5% +56 -13 42.1% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 3–8 (27%) +0.69
Career 1928 144.9 +0.24 +1.08 1.018 50.3% -6 -38 +4 52.2% +0.15 90–84 (52%) 93–94 (50%) 100.6 +0.52 2042 153.8 +1.56 +2.23 1.088 51.6% +35 -188 -160 57.2% +0.48 97–99 (49%) 127–119 (52%) 97.2 +1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.