H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Jan Hernych H2H: 0-1
Jan Hernych holds a 1–0 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jan Hernych leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jan Hernych won the 2004 Indianapolis third round 7-5 1-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2004 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jan Hernych | 7-5 1-0 (ret.) | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Jan Hernych | #1,606 | #59 | 1,157 | 1,780 | 79 | 115 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Jan Hernych | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 2005 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #74 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 2006 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 2007 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #156 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #113 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #168 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #193 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #286 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #424 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |